Xue Feng

and 10 more

Objective To provide a better pathological method for clinical diagnosis of endometrial lesions. Design Comparing the accuracy of hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) with Papanicolaou stain for endometrial cytology. Setting The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Population or Sample 180 patients. Methods Endometrial slides were stained by H-E and Papanicolaou methods, respectively. The cytology between them were compared, with histology as standard control, as well as the cost performance. Main Outcome Measures The dyeing degree of satisfaction, sensitivity, specificity, Cohen’s kappa coefficient, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, Youden index, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. The price and service time of dye, dyeing efficiency, and dyeing time. Results The sensitivity of H-E stain was higher than that of Papanicolaou stain. The specificity of H-E stain was same to that of Papanicolaou stain. Cohen’s kappa coefficient indicatied a high consistency between them. The morphological characterization of Papanicolaou stain were superior to those of H-E stain. The cost performance of H-E stain was lower. Conclusions In terms of overall evaluations and economic benefits, H-E stain is better than Papanicolaou stain. If a small sample volume of endometrial cells, Papanicolaou stain is recommended. Funding The Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China, the Major Basic Research Project of Natural Science of Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department, the Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Department. Keywords: H-E stain, Papanicolaou stain, Endometrium, Cytology

Zhihua Ma

and 7 more

Objective: To confirm the differences in the risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (EOC-VTE) among patients on different continents. Methods: We reviewed all EOC-VTE cases from two tertiary hospitals for ten years. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant risk factors for VTE. Then we searched the literature on EOC-VTE risk assessments. The risk factors presented in the acquired literature and our data were evaluated by meta-analysis. Two subgroups, according to the continents mentioned in the studies, were set as Asia and Europe & America, respectively for analyzation. Results: A total of 122 patients with EOC-VTE were included. We found six significant risk factors for VTE among cases of EOC by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Among the 2064 initial articles, only 30 met the inclusion criteria. Including our data, there were cumulative 1432 cases and 9874 controls. The meta-analysis selected 13 out of 23 possible risk factors. Risk factors were not identical between subgroups. Except for five same elements, the Asia subgroup had six other significant risk factors for EOC-VTE that were preoperative D-Dimer > 0.3mg/L (OR: 5.030, 95% CI: 2.003-12.635), surgery time ≥ 180min (OR: 3.459, 95% CI: 2.198-5.441), WHO performance status score > 1 (OR: 2.847, 95% CI: 1.840-4.405), hypertension (OR: 1.945, 95% CI: 1.238-3.058), age ≥ 60 years (OR: 1.821, 95% CI: 1.374-2.413) and preoperative blood platelet > 300 × 109/L (OR: 1.532, 95% CI: 1.025-2.289). Accordingly, another two significant risk factors were found in Europe & America subgroup, which were the initial FIGO stage (Ⅲ/Ⅳ) (OR: 2.837, 95% CI: 2.147-3.748) and postmenopausal status (OR: 1.926, 95% CI: 1.025-3.622). Six EOC-VTE risk factors in our data were covered by the 11 risk factors of Asian subgroup analyzes. Conclusions: Patients in Asia and Europe & America have different risk factors for EOC-VTE.