Abstract
We report behavioural findings implying common motion processing for
auditory and visual motion. We presented brief translational motion
stimuli drifting leftwards or rightwards in the visual or auditory
modality at various speeds. Observers made a speed discrimination on
each trial, comparing current speed against mean speed (i.e., method of
single stimuli). Data were compiled into psychometric functions and
means and slopes compared. Slopes between auditory and visual motion
were identical, consistent with a common noise source, although mean
speed for audition was veridical while visual speeds were significantly
underestimated. An inter-trial analysis revealed clear motion priming in
both audition and vision (i.e., faster perceived speed after a fast
preceding speed, and vice versa – a positive serial dependence).
Plotting priming as a function of preceding speed revealed the same
slope for each modality. We also tested whether motion priming was
modality specific. Whether vision preceded audition, or audition
preceded vision, a positive serial bias (i.e., priming) was always
observed. We conclude a common process underlies auditory and visual
motion, and that this explains the closely matched data in vision and
audition, as well as the crossmodal data showing equivalent motion
priming regardless of the preceding trial’s modality.