Epidemiological studies have explored the relationship between allergic diseases and cancer risk or prognosis in AllergoOncology. Some studies suggest an inverse association, but uncertainties remain, including in IgE-mediated diseases and glioma. Allergic disease stems from a Th2-biased immune response to allergens in predisposed atopic individuals. Allergic disorders vary in phenotype, genotype, and endotype, affecting their pathophysiology. Beyond clinical manifestation and commonly used clinical markers, there is ongoing research to identify novel biomarkers for allergy diagnosis, monitoring, severity assessment, and treatment. Gliomas, the most common and diverse brain tumours, have in parallel undergone changes in classification over time, with specific molecular biomarkers defining glioma subtypes. Gliomas exhibit a complex tumour-immune interphase and distinct immune microenvironment features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy hold promise for primary brain tumour treatment, but require more specific and effective approaches. Animal studies indicate allergic airway inflammation may delay glioma progression. This collaborative European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Position Paper summarizes recent advances and emerging biomarkers for refined allergy and adult-type diffuse glioma classification to inform future epidemiological and clinical studies. Future research is needed to enhance our understanding of immune-glioma interactions to ultimately improve patient prognosis and survival.

Cellular and humoral responses to fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a real life cohort of patients with cancer To the Editor,Patients with cancer are at increased risk of adverse outcomes when infected with SARS-CoV-2 and show an impeded humoral and cellular immune response to vaccination (1). A fourth vaccination increased the humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2 including Omicron sublineages better than Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (2). However, data on effects of a fourth SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on cellular immunity, particularly in relation to antibody responses, are scarce (3).Methods : To analyze specific cellular immunity after fourth immunization, SARS-CoV-2 specific CD4+ / CD8+ T-cell responses were prospectively measured in 7 patients with histologically confirmed neoplastic disease before and at the next clinical visit after fourth vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (S) and the receptor binding domain (RBD). Moreover, IgG against S and RBD of Omicron (BA.4) and Hu-1, respectively were assessed. A >1.1-fold increase of antigen-specific proliferated cells and antibody levels compared to baseline was defined as a vaccine response. Assays were performed as described previously (4). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna (vote 1427/2022) and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all included participants. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, Version 9.4.1 (San Diego, California, USA).Results : Six patients with solid tumors and one immunocompetent patient with CNS lymphoma (median age [range] 64 years [45-78], 7 men) were prospectively included and received a fourth vaccination (one mRNA-1273 and six BNT162b2). Of these patients, 6 patients were undergoing active anti-neoplastic therapy. The baseline blood sampling was performed in median 7 months (range 5-9 months) after the third vaccine dose, while the follow-up blood sampling was done in median 21 days (range: 19-30 days) after the fourth vaccination (Table 1) .Overall, clear signs of response on either humoral, cellular, or combined humoral and cellular levels were observed in 6/7 patients. However, a striking intra- and interpatient heterogeneity of immune response patterns was evident (Figure 1 ). Only 2/7 patients (patients 4 and 6) responded with combined increases in S and RBD specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation. All other patients showed inconsistent increases in T-cell activity with low vaccination responses in at least one T-cell subpopulation. Additionally, humoral response did not consistently coincide with cellular vaccine responses: patients 4 and 6, who had no or only a mild (e.g. IgG against S 0.97-fold change and 2.23-fold change, respectively) increase in antibody levels had a pronounced cellular vaccine response (e.g. CD4 against S 4-fold change and 134-fold change, respectively). Interestingly, patient 5 increased antibody levels against S without corresponding CD4+ responses. Moreover, patients with distinct antibody increases only showed mediocre vaccine responses on cellular level (Patients 1, 2 and 7). One patient (patient 3), showed severely impeded humoral and cellular vaccine responses to the fourth vaccination applied 433 days after administration of the last B-cell targeting treatment (Rituximab).Conclusions : The most important limitation of this prospective study is its small sample size and the lack of a control group. However, we observed high intra- and interpatient heterogeneity with clear indications of humoral, cellular, or combined response to fourth vaccine in most patients under active treatment. Of note, our observation indicates long-lasting impairment of specific immune responses after a fourth vaccine on both humoral and cellular levels as long as 36 months after last rituximab administration. These findings highlight the need for reliable identification of and development of management strategies for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine non-responders among patients receiving anti-cancer therapies.References :1. Mairhofer M, Kausche L, Kaltenbrunner S, Ghanem R, Stegemann M, Klein K et al. Humoral and cellular immune responses in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-vaccinated patients with cancer. Cancer Cell. 2021;39 :1171–1172.2. Mair MJ, Mitterer M, Gattinger P, Berger JM, Valenta R, Fong D et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.4 Variants After Fourth Vaccination or Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab Administration in Patients With Cancer. JAMA Oncol Published Online First: September 2022. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.42263. Debie Y, Van Audenaerde JRM, Vandamme T, Croes L, Teuwen L-A, Verbruggen L et al. Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 after Third Dose BNT162b2 following Double-Dose Vaccination with BNT162b2 versus ChAdOx1 in Patients with Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022;:OF1–OF12.4. Gattinger P, Niespodziana K, Stiasny K, Sahanic S, Tulaeva I, Borochova K et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 requires antibodies against conformational receptor-binding domain epitopes. Allergy2022;77 :230–242.