Alexander Todd

and 11 more

There is large uncertainty in the future sea level change at regional scales under anthropogenic global warming. This study uses a novel design of ocean-only general circulation model (OGCM) experiments to investigate the ocean’s response to surface buoyancy and momentum flux perturbations, as part of the Flux-Anomaly-Forced Model Intercomparison Project (FAFMIP), and compares with results from coupled, atmosphere-ocean GCM (AOGCM) experiments. Much of the inter-model spread is driven by the response to surface heat flux perturbations. In a multi-model ensemble of OGCMs forced with identical surface heat flux perturbations, regional sea level and ocean heat content changes demonstrate considerable disagreement, especially in the North Atlantic. Spread in both residual mean advection and diapycnal diffusion changes contribute to much of the multi-model disagreement over regional heat content change. Residual mean advection changes are related to the large spread in simulated Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) weakening (20-50%). We find approximately 10% more AMOC weakening in response to surface heat flux perturbations in AOGCMs relative to OGCMs with consistent ocean models. This enhanced AMOC weakening is driven by an atmosphere-ocean feedback which amplifies the surface heat flux perturbation. In the North Pacific, there is little agreement amongst the ensemble over which processes lead to ocean warming, with varying contributions from residual mean advection and diapycnal diffusion. For the Pacific basin, the atmosphere-ocean feedback reduces sea surface temperature (SST) warming by 0.5°C. In the Southern Ocean, the atmosphere-ocean feedback is not generally important for buoyancy and momentum flux perturbations.

Michael Richard Grose

and 19 more

Outputs from new state-of-the-art climate models under the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) promise improvement and enhancement of climate change projections information for Australia. Here we focus on three key aspects of CMIP6: what is new in these models, how the available CMIP6 models evaluate compared to CMIP5, and their projections of the future Australian climate compared to CMIP5 focussing on the highest emissions scenario. The CMIP6 ensemble has several new features of relevance to policy-makers and others, for example the integrated matrix of socio-economic and concentration pathways. The CMIP6 models show incremental improvements in the simulation of the climate in the Australian region, including a reduced equatorial Pacific cold-tongue bias, slightly improved rainfall teleconnections with regional climate drivers, improved representation of atmosphere and ocean extreme heat events, as well as dynamic sea level. However, important regional biases remain, evident in the excessive precipitation over the Maritime Continent and precipitation pattern biases in the nearby tropical convergence zones. Projections of temperature and rainfall from the available CMIP6 ensemble broadly agree with those from CMIP5, except for a group of CMIP6 models with higher climate sensitivity and greater warming and increase in some extremes after 2050. CMIP6 rainfall projections are similar to CMIP5, but the ensemble examined has a narrower range of rainfall change in summer in the north and winter in the south. Overall, future national projections are likely to be similar to previous versions but perhaps with some areas of improved confidence and clarity.