Here, we review in depth how soils can remember moisture anomalies across spatial and temporal scales, embedded in the concept of soil moisture memory (SMM), and we explain the mechanisms and factors that initiate and control SMM. Specifically, we explore external and internal drivers that affect SMM, including extremes, atmospheric variables, anthropogenic activities, soil and vegetation properties, soil hydrologic processes, and groundwater dynamics. We analyze how SMM considerations should affect sampling frequency and data source collection. We discuss the impact of SMM on weather variability, land surface energy balance, extreme events (drought, wildfire, and flood), water use efficiency, and biogeochemical cycles. We also discuss the effects of SMM on various land surface processes, focusing on the coupling between soil moisture, water and energy balance, vegetation dynamics, and feedback on the atmosphere. We address the spatiotemporal variability of SMM and how it is affected by seasonal variation, location, and soil depth. Regarding the representation and integration of SMM in land surface models, we provide insights on how to improve predictions and parameterizations in LSMs and address model complexity issues. The possible use of satellite observations for identifying and quantifying SMM is also explored, emphasizing the need for greater temporal frequency, spatial resolution, and coverage of measurements. We provide guidance for further research and practical applications by providing a comprehensive definition of SMM, considering its multifaceted perspective.

The spatio-temporal variation of stomatal conductance directly regulates photosynthesis, water partitioning, and biosphere-atmosphere interactions. While many studies have focused on stomatal response to stresses, the spatial variation of unstressed stomatal conductance remains poorly determined, and is usually characterized in land surface models (LSMs) simply based on plant functional type (PFT). Here, we derived unstressed stomatal conductance at the ecosystem-scale using observations from 115 global FLUXNET sites. When aggregated by PFTs, the across-PFT pattern was highly consistent with the parameterizations of LSMs. However, PFTs alone captured only 17\% of the variation in unstressed stomatal conductance across sites. Within the same PFT, unstressed stomatal conductance was negatively related to climate dryness and canopy height, which explained 45\% of the total spatial variation. Our results highlight the importance of plant-environment interactions in shaping stomatal traits. The trait-environment relationship established here provides an empirical approach for improved parameterizations of stomatal conductance in LSMs.

Tropical peatlands are among the most carbon-dense ecosystems on Earth, and their water storage dynamics strongly control these carbon stocks. The hydrological functioning of tropical peatlands differs from that of northern peatlands, which has not yet been accounted for in global land surface models (LSMs). Here, we integrated tropical peat-specific hydrology modules into a global LSM for the first time, by utilizing the peatland-specific model structure adaptation (PEATCLSM) of the NASA Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM). We developed literature-based parameter sets for natural (PEATCLSMTrop,Nat) and drained (PEATCLSMTrop,Drain) tropical peatlands. The operational CLSM version (which includes peat as a soil class) and PEATCLSMTrop,Nat were forced with global meteorological input data and evaluated over the major tropical peatland regions in Central and South America, the Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia. Evaluation against a unique and extensive data set of in situ water level and eddy covariance-derived evapotranspiration showed an overall improvement in bias and correlation over all three study regions. Over Southeast Asia, an additional simulation with PEATCLSMTrop,Drain was run to address the large fraction of drained tropical peatlands in this region. PEATCLSMTrop,Drain outperformed both CLSM and PEATCLSMTrop,Nat over drained sites. Despite the overall improvements of both tropical PEATCLSM modules, there are strong differences in performance between the three study regions. We attribute these performance differences to regional differences in accuracy of meteorological forcing data, and differences in peatland hydrologic response that are not yet captured by our model.