The five divisions of NASA’s Science Mission Directorate (SMD) represent a very broad spectrum of academic disciplines, ranging from Astronomy, to Planetary science, to Heliophysics, Earth science, Biology and Physical science with measurement scales ranging from components of atoms to the structure of the entire universe. In addition, the systems that support access to these data range from systems based on formal and broadly accepted OWL ontologies, to those based on current and historical disciplinary metadata standards, to ad-hoc or bespoke systems dating back to NASA’s very earliest missions; all generally developed to support the mission or, more recently, discipline focussed data users. Consequently the access mechanisms, data structures, vocabularies, terms in use, etc. vary widely across the divisions making cross-disciplinary research at best difficult if not impossible. Currently NASA SMD is working to improve support for cross-disciplinary/transdisciplinary research by developing a system that supports discovery across all of SMD’s data products, a model that can be extended to all forms of scientific output including software, tools, models, publications, etc. The core underpinnings of such a system is an information model being developed using the methodology developed by Dr. Peter Fox and Dr. Deborah McGuinness. Here we discuss the model (a knowledge graph), lessons learned along the way, and key findings for other systems attempting to bridge across broad disciplinary challenges.

The open science movement continues to gain momentum, attention and discussion. However, there are a number of different interpretations, viewpoints and perspectives as to what the term ‘open science’ means. In this paper, we define open science as a collaborative culture enabled by technology that empowers the open sharing of data, information and knowledge within the scientific community and the wider public to accelerate scientific research and understanding. Opportunities exist for data programs to encourage and accelerate open science through thoughtful design. This paper provides a synopsis of various open science activities happening throughout the community and synthesizes those activities around three broad open science focus areas. The paper then describes how data programs are in a unique position to set strategic directions that support and promote open science within the three focus areas. The paper also discusses the challenges the community faces in promoting open science. The paper closes with a call to action for both data programs and individual researchers to support the wider adoption of open science principles.

Open, interdisciplinary science inevitably relies heavily on standards. Standards are those often unseen agreements that we take for granted when systems and processes are working fine. Yet standards work is perpetual, laborious, and sometimes contentious, especially for standards to work across diverse disciplines. Standards development, maintenance, and implementation is a complex, ongoing socio-technical process. NASA has developed a progressively open science policy and strategy that calls for the establishment of a data standards process reaching across the five diverse divisions of the Science Mission Directorate. This is a delicate exercise. We, therefore, seek to apply a holistic yet pragmatic approach to developing and maintaining a standards process. We adopt an ecological philosophy that focuses on the interactions within the data ecosystem and how standards facilitate those interactions. We couple high-level analysis with on the ground experimentation. We began by 1) mapping information ecosystem components (e.g. data centers, missions, services, protocols, users), 2) establishing how the components interact (e.g. sharing (meta)data, funding, personnel exchange), and 3) modelling system dynamics (e.g. creation of products from multiple data centers, redundant processes, shared services). The goal is to apply understanding of the ecosystem to real world applications (e.g. planning a new mission, implementing new policy requirements, improving process efficiency, etc.). We have also conducted studies of historical standardization efforts, documenting lessons learned and cautionary tales. We then contrast this more abstract work with real examples. We reviewed and assessed multiple existing standards development processes both within and external to NASA. We now work to implement an initial test process which can be further optimized. We seek to define a consistent approach for assigning persistent identifiers for research objects, especially for the purposes of citation. The experience from this relatively ‘simple’ test case adds a pragmatic perspective on how researchers and engineers actually work. This presentation will review the details of this methodology and our initial findings.