Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) is an important late effect of childhood cancer. The combination of rising obesity and high prevalence of under-nutrition at diagnosis, make this a unique population to study in LMIC (lower middle-income countries). Method: Children <18 years of age at cancer diagnosis, in a single-centre in a LMIC, who were disease free and had completed treatment at least 2 years prior to study were included. MetSyn was defined using International Federation for Diabetes criteria for Asian Indians. Univariate and multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the influence of risk factors on MetSyn. Delta BMI (body mass index) was further studied using receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: A high prevalence of MetSyn (12.2%), central obesity (33%), and dyslipidemia (61.8%) was found in a cohort of 500 childhood cancer survivors (CCS) at a mean follow-up age of 17 years. Logistic regression analysis revealed male gender, OR 2.4(1.1-5.4), older age at diagnosis >10 years, OR 2.9(1.6-5), longer survival duration >10 years, OR 2.2(1.3-3.8), high BMI at diagnosis OR 3.2(1.5-6.9), high delta BMI >50, OR 3.15(1.7-5.9) and cranial RT among children <5 years with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, OR, 5.5(1.5-2), to be independent predictors of MetSyn. Delta BMI (>50) strongly predicted MetSyn among patients who were under-weight or normal at diagnosis (OR, 12.5,1.7-92). Conclusion: Our CCS are at high risk of MetSyn and its components at an early age. Monitoring delta BMI during follow-up can be useful for screening CCS at risk for this modifiable late effect of cancer treatment.

Introduction: The InPOG-HL-15-01, a multi-centric prospective study used a risk-stratified and response-based approach with a doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) backbone to treat children with newly diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) and reduce the use of radiation therapy (RT). Children/adolescents with bulky disease or inadequate response at early response assessment (ERA) after 2 cycles of chemotherapy were assigned to receive RT. For ERA, positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) was recommended but not mandatory in view of limited access. This study aimed to compare the impact of using contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) vs PET-CT on treatment decisions and outcomes. Methodology: 396 patients were enrolled and 382 had an ERA at the assigned time point. Results: At ERA, satisfactory response was documented in 277/382 (72.5%) participants and this was significantly higher in PET-CT (151/186, 81.2%) as compared to CECT (126/196, 64.3%) respectively (p value<0.001). Amongst the 203 patients with non-bulky disease (wherein the indication for RT was entirely dependent on ERA), 96/114 (84.2%) and 61/89 (68.5%) patients achieved a satisfactory response according to the PET-CT and CECT (p value=0.008) respectively and hence a lesser proportion of patients in the PET-CT arm received RT. Despite a lower usage of RT the 5 year overall survival (OS) of both groups- ERA based on CECT (91.8%) vs PET-CT (94.1%) was comparable (p value=0.391) and so was the 5 year event free survival (EFS) (86.7 vs 85.5%, p value=0.724). Conclusion: Use of PET-CT as the modality for ERA is more likely to indicate a satisfactory response as compared to CECT and thereby decreases the need for RT in response-based treatment algorithm for HL afflicted children. The reduction in the application of RT did not impact the overall outcome and plausibly would lower the risk of delayed toxic effects.