Background Allergic diseases represent a major global health issue with more than one third of the global population affected with at least one allergic condition. Allergic conditions can not only cause life threatening anaphylactic reactions but also impact on daily life with significant influence on mental health and quality of life (QoL) Objectives This study aims to evaluate the health related QoL and depression severity among patients presenting in a tertiary care allergy center. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 628 patients presenting with allergic symptoms or previously diagnosed allergies between October 2018 and April 2019 and screened for depression and QoL impairment. Results 73.3% (n=437/596) of the patients suffered from at least one previously diagnosed allergic disease, most frequently to pollen (36.2%, n=220/607) or food (26.7%, n=162/607), and 19.6 % (n=119/607) suffered from urticaria. 16.6% of the total study population suffered from depression. Urticaria as well as insect venom, food/food additive allergies and drug allergies significantly affected the quality of life and depression severity (p<.001), reflected by higher DLQI and BDI scores and lower scores in the EQ5D-3L index. Conclusion Our results provide evidence for a possible association of allergies (e.g. against insect venom, food/food additives and drugs) and/or urticaria with a reduced life quality and a higher depression rate. Patients particularly indicated restrictions in the dimensions pain/discomfort as well as anxiety/depression. A standardized questionnaire for evaluating the mental health status of patients with allergies and/or urticaria might be beneficial to be implemented as a regular screening method.
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), is a rare but severe delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reaction [[](#ref-0001)1]. Its reported incidence ranges between 2 and 5 cases per million per year and the mortality between 5 and 10% [[](#ref-0002)2]. DRESS is characterized by the occurrence of an extensive rash with face edema, lymphadenopathy and fever and organ damage, all of which seems to result from massive drug-directed T cell response and associated eosinophilia. DRESS is a complex condition, its clinical presentation varies depending on the cutaneous manifestation(s), affected target organ(s) and reaction severity. The diagnosis of DRESS is further challenged by the clinical overlay with autoimmune, infectious and lymphoproliferative conditions, which have to be considered in the differential diagnosis (Table 1). Eosinophilia is detected in only 80 % of DRESS patients and can be masked by e.g. the administration of systemic glucocorticoids (GCS). Furthermore, there are various differences in the DRESS diagnostic criteria (Table 1) developed by the Japanese SCAR (JSPS) [[](#ref-0003)3] and RegiSCAR [[](#ref-0004)4] groups, the most notable being the inclusion of herpes viremia in the criteria developed by the JSPS. All these clinical challenges underline the importance of a systematic and comprehensive approach when encountering a patient with suspected DRESS. Based on the most recent literature and our clinical expertise, we therefore suggest the medical algorithm depicted in Figure 1. DRESS should be evoked as a differential diagnosis in patients with a rash suspected to be drug-related and associated with head-and-neck edema [[](#ref-0005)5]. Clinical history-taking is a critical element to consolidate or discard a drug-related etiology: most importantly, this should explore the dynamics of both possible DRESS clinical symptoms and drug exposure(s) (date of onset, way and length of administration, previous exposures / reactions). A long drug exposure prior to disease onset, i.e. 2-8 weeks, is indicative for DRESS rather than other drug hypersensitivities – but the duration may vary depending on the causative drug. A thorough clinical examination, basic laboratory work-up, electrocardiogram, and - if a rash is present - a skin biopsy should also be performed. If the clinical presentation and drug exposure history substantiate the DRESS diagnosis, additional investigations should be performed depending on the suspected target organ damage (cf. case “complementary, patient-specific work-up”). Once the diagnosis is established, a severity assessment is warranted, since DRESS can range from mild forms with very limited organ damage to fulminant ones, e.g. characterized by (multi-)organ failure. There are no consensual severity scoring. In this algorithm, we suggest the scoring system used in France (RCT DRESSCODE, https://clinicaltrial.gov NCT01987076).