Introduction: Hematologic complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are well described in hospitalized adults with correlation to adverse outcomes. Information published in children has been limited. Methods: An international multi-centered retrospective registry was established to collect data on the clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) in hospitalized children between February 1, 2020 – May 31, 2021. This sub-study focused on hematologic manifestations. Study variables included patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, course, laboratory parameters, management, and outcomes. Results: Nine hundred and eighty-five children were enrolled and 915 (93%) had clinical information available; 385 (42%) had symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection upon admission, 288 had MIS-C (31.4%) and 242 (26.4%) had alternate diagnosis with SARS-CoV-2 identified incidentally. During hospitalization, 10 children (1%) experienced a thrombotic event, 16 (1.7%) had hemorrhage and 2 (0.2%) had both thrombotic and hemorrhagic episodes. Significant prothrombotic comorbidities included congenital heart disease (p-value = 0.007), central venous catheter (p = 0.04) in children with primary SARS-CoV-2 infection; and obesity (p-value= 0.002), cytokine storm (p= 0.012) in those with MIS-C. Significant pro- hemorrhagic conditions included age > 10 years (p = 0.04), CVC (p= 0.03) in children with primary SARS-CoV-2infection; and thrombocytopenia (0.001), cytokine storm (0.02) in those with MIS-C. Eleven patients died (1.2 %) with no deaths attributed to thrombosis or hemorrhage Conclusion: Thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications are uncommon in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection and observed with underlying co-morbid conditions. Understanding the complete spectrum of hematologic complications in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection or MIS-C requires ongoing multi-center studies.

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a useful tool to determine endotracheal tube placement; however, few studies have compared it with standard methods of confirmation. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and time-to-interpretation for correct identification of tracheal versus esophageal intubations compared to a composite of standard-of-care methods in neonates. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi Pakistan. All required intubations were performed as per NICU guidelines. The ETT placement was determined using standard-of-care methods (auscultation, colorimetric capnography, and chest X-ray) by a clinical team, and simultaneously by POCUS. Timings were recorded for each method by independent study staff. Results: A total of 348 neonates were enrolled in the study. More than half (58%) of intubations were in an emergency scenario. Using an expert as the reference standard, POCUS user interpretation showed 100% sensitivity and 94% specificity. We found a 99.4% agreement (Kappa: 0.96; p<0.001) between the POCUS user and expert. Diagnostic accuracy of POCUS compared with at least two standard-of-care methods demonstrated 99.7% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and 98.9% agreement (Kappa:0.93; p<0.001). The median time required for POCUS interpretation was 3.0 (IQR 3.0 -4.0) seconds for tracheal intubation. The time recorded for auscultation and capnography was 6.0 (IQR 5.0 -7.0) and 3.0 (IQR 3.0-4.0) respectively. Conclusion: POCUS is a rapid and reliable method of identifying ETT placement in neonates. Early and correct identification of airway management is critical to save lives and prevent mortality and morbidity.