Survival of Wilms tumor (WT) is >90% in high-resource settings but <30% in low-resource settings. Adapting a standardized surgical approach to WT is challenging in low-resource settings, but a local control strategy is crucial to improving outcomes. Objective: Provide resource-sensitive recommendations for the surgical management of WT. Methods: We performed a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE through July 7, 2020, and used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and recommendations. Recommendations: Initiation of treatment should be expedited, and surgery should be done in a high-volume setting. Cross-sectional imaging should be done to optimize preoperative planning. For patients with typical clinical features of WT, biopsy should not be done before chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should precede surgical resection. Also, resection should include a large transperitoneal laparotomy, adequate lymph node sampling, and documentation of staging findings. For WT with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given before en bloc resection of the tumor and thrombus and evaluation for viable tumor thrombus. For those with bilateral WT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given for 6–12 weeks. Neither routine use of complex hilar control techniques during nephron-sparing surgery, nor nephron-sparing resection for unilateral WT with a normal contralateral kidney is recommended. When indicated, postoperative radiotherapy should be administered within 14 days of surgery. Post-chemotherapy pulmonary oligometastasis should be resected when feasible, if local protocols allow omission of whole-lung irradiation in patients with non-anaplastic histology stage IV WT with pulmonary metastasis without evidence of extrapulmonary metastasis. Conclusion: We provide evidence-based recommendations for the surgical management of WT, considering the benefits/risks associated with limited-resource settings.

Background: Interval compression (IC), defined as 2 week-long cycles of alternating vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide/etoposide, improves survival for localized Ewing sarcoma. The outcomes of patients with metastatic disease treated with IC are uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of pediatric patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma treated with IC at our center between January-2013 and March-2020. We calculated event-free survival and overall survival and used log rank tests for univariate comparisons. Results: We identified 34 patients aged 2.7–17.1 years (median,11.6 years). Twenty-six patients (76%) had pulmonary metastases, and 14 (41%) had extra-pulmonary metastases in the bone (n = 11), lymph nodes (n = 2), and intraspinal tissue (n = 1). All patients received local control therapy: surgery only (n = 7, 21%), radiotherapy only (n = 18, 53%), or both (n = 9, 26%). The estimated 3-year OS and EFS were 62%±9% and 39%±9%, respectively. Patients with pulmonary only metastasis had a 3-year OS of 88%±8% in comparison to those with extra-pulmonary metastasis of 27%±13% (P=0.0074). Survival did not differ according to age group (> vs < 12 years), metastasis site, or primary tumor site, but 3-year event-free survival significantly differed according to local control therapy (surgery only, 83% ± 15%; combined surgery and radiation, 30% ± 18%; radiation only, 15% ± 10%; P = .048). Conclusion: IC yielded similar outcomes for patients with metastatic Ewing sarcoma to that reported in the literature using other regimens. We suggest including this approach to other blocks of therapy