Aurora Dybedokken

and 9 more

Ida Bo Nissen

and 3 more

Introduction: Children treated for cancer with a central venous catheter are often bothered by scarring. We studied whether glucocorticosteroid during patch occlusion has a beneficial effect on scar outcome in children and adolescents treated for neoplastic disease. Methods: A double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was performed. The main outcome was the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). Secondary outcomes were scar width and scar quality measured using the Patient and observer scar assessment (POSAS). The patients were divided into an intervention groups and a control group. The intervention group was randomized into two groups; Active and placebo group. The active treatment consisted of cream with glucocorticosteroid and fusidic acid. The placebo treatment consisted of cream with fusidic acid. Both groups were also treated with a silicone gel patch for three months after central venous catheter removal. The control group did not receive any specific skin care. Results: Assessment at 6 months were completed for 44 in the intervention group (21 in the active and 23 in the placebo group) and 47 in the comtrol group. The intervention group had a significantly lower VSS and a smaller scar compared to the control group (p = 0.00, p = 0.02). The POSAS by the patients and the study nurse showed no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p = 0.84, p= 0.36). Conclusions: Silicone gel sheet alone or in combination with application of glucocorticosteroid during sheet occlusion improved scar outcome after removal of central venous catheter in children treated for neoplastic diseases.
Introduction: Several studies on late effects of childhood cancer have been conducted during the past decades. To ensure external validation of a study population, the participation rate must be high. This study investigated demographic data in late effect studies and potential factors impacting on participation rates such as cancer type, time since diagnosis and duration of clinical examinations. Procedure: By searching the databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science and by contacting researchers and clinicians, we identified studies including an invitation to a clinical examination for late effects after childhood cancer. Studies conducted from January 2010 - March 2020 in the Nordic countries were included. Results: We found 80 published studies originating from 16 cohorts. The overall participation rates ranged between 27 and 100%. The majority of studies (eleven studies) were conducted more than ten years after the cancer diagnosis and primarily on hematologic malignancies (seven studies). The highest participation rates were seen in studies of survivors with solid tumors (92%) and the lowest in survivors with hematologic malignancies (67%) and central nervous system tumors (73%). Neither duration of the clinical examination nor time since diagnosis seemed to affect the participation rate. Conclusion: A trend of lower participation rates when recruiting survivors of hematologic malignancies and central nervous system tumors was found. We encourage future studies to describe the recruitment process more thouroughly to improve understanding of the factors influencing participation rates.