Objective:After radical prostatectomy,prostate-specific antigen(PSA) value measuring ≥0.1ng/ml is defined as persistent PSA(pPSA) and in many studies,it was found to be associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis.Our aim in this study is to point out the pathological and clinical factors affecting pPSA among the patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy(RARP) in an experienced academic center and to make a nomogram,predicting pPSA value based on operative data,useful. Methods:We examined records of 1273 patients who underwent RARP retrospectively. Preoperative,operative,and postoperative data were collected.Based on the PSA values (ng/ml) measured after 4-to-8 weeks of RARP,patients were divided into 2 groups as pPSA group (Group1)(n=97) with PSA values ≥0.1ng/ml and undetectable PSA group (Group2)(n=778) with PSA values <0.1ng/ml.Later on,Group1 was further divided into Group1a (PSA:0.1-0.2ng/ml) and Group 1b (PSA≥0.2ng/ml) to evaluate biochemical recurrence(BCR). Results:Multivariate logistic regression analyses of the collected data revealed that PSA>20ng/ml,operation time,a postoperative international society of urological pathology (ISUP) grade of ≥4, pT 3-4, and pN were independently associated with pPSA.According to the results, a nomogram predicting pPSA was developed(Table 4).By looking at the nomogram pPSA was found in 98.9% of the cases with a PSA value of ≥20ng/ml, an operation time of 150 minutes, a postoperative ISUP grade of 4-5, a positive lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status, pT3-T4, and pN+; while pPSA was found in 25.5% of the cases with a PSA value of <20 ng/ml, an operation time of 100 minutes, a postoperative ISUP grade of <4-5, a negative LVI status, pT<3-4, and pN-.The estimated BCR-free survival time was 16.3 months in Group 1a and 57.0 months in Group2 (p<0.001).Adjuvant treatment ratio was 64.9% in Group1 and 7.1% in Group2 (p<0.001). Conclusion:For the patients who underwent RARP,factors associated with aggressive disease can predict the PSA persistence.To plan our treatment modalities accurately,an applicable nomogram in daily practice would be useful.

Objective: To present a nation-wide analysis of the workload of urology departments in Turkey week-by-week during Covid-19 pandemic. Methodology: The centers participating in the study were divided into three groups as tertiary referral centers, state hospitals and private practice hospitals. The number of outpatients, inpatients, daily interventions and urological surgeries were recorded prospectively between 9-March-2020 and 31-May-2020. All these variables were recorded for the same time interval of 2019 as well. The weekly change of the workload of urology during pandemic period was evaluated; also the workload of urology and the distributions of certain urological surgeries were compared between the pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019. Results: A total of 51 centers participated in the study. The number of outpatients, inpatients, urological surgeries and daily interventions were found to be dramatically decreased by the third week of pandemics in state hospitals and tertiary referral centers; however the daily urological practice were similar in private practice hospitals throughout the pandemic period. When the workload of urology in pandemic period and the same time interval of the year 2019 were compared; a huge decrease was observed in all variables during pandemic period. However, temporary measures like ureteral stenting, nephrostomy placement and percutaneous cystostomy have been found to increase during Covid-19 pandemic compared to normal life. Conclusions: Covid-19 pandemic significantly effected the routine daily urological practice likewise other subspecialties and priority was given to emergent and non-deferrable surgeries by urologists in concordance with published clinical guidelines.