loading page

Early nasal intermittent positive pressure versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • +4
  • yuanxia zou,
  • xiaoxiu Ye,
  • Jie Li,
  • guiping Li,
  • run Li,
  • huan Wang,
  • Long Chen
yuanxia zou
The Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
xiaoxiu Ye
The Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University
Author Profile
Jie Li
the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Author Profile
guiping Li
The Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University
Author Profile
run Li
The Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University
Author Profile
huan Wang
The Affiliated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Southwest Medical University
Author Profile
Long Chen
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics
Author Profile

Abstract

Background Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) are two widely used ways of noninvasive ventilation. Whether or not early NIPPV simultaneously reducing the incidences of invasive ventilation(IV) and BPD as compared with NCPAP in preterm infants with RDS remains unclear. The present study aims to systematically assess the beneficial effects between NIPPV and NCPAP. Methods: A search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(from 1980 to Feb 2022) was performed, and randomized controlled trials(RCTs) comparing early NIPPV with NCPAP in preterm infants with RDS were included. The primary outcome was simultaneous incidences of IV and BPD. Results: Meta-analysis of 13 RCTs (n = 1681) demonstrated that, compared with NCPAP, early NIPPV concurrently reduced the incidences of IV [relative risk (RR):0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43, 0.63, P < 0.00001] and BPD (RR: 0.51, 95%CI 0.37, 0.71, P < 0.0001). Similarities were also shown in the subgroups receiving surfactant [IV (RR:0.59, 95%CI 0.45, 0.77, P = 0.0001) and BPD (RR: 0.57, 95%CI 0.37, 0.87, P = 0.009) ], birth weight(BW) ≤ 1,500g [IV (P < 0.0001) and BPD (P = 0.004) ] and excluding RCTs with significant difference referring to IV (P = 0.0004) and BPD (P = 0.02) . Conclusions: Early NIPPV could be superior to NCPAP in concurrently decreasing the incidences of IV and BPD in preterm infants with RDS, especially in the infants receiving surfactant and whose BW ≤ 1,500g.