Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a balloon-based visually guided laser ablation (VGLA) is regarded as a useful therapeutic tool for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). The clinical efficacy of a VGLA has never been fully investigated in patients with a left common pulmonary vein (LCPV). Objective: We investigated the procedural safety as well as clinical usefulness of VGLA in patients with an LCPV. Methods: This study consisted of 130 consecutive patients who underwent VGLA of de novo non-valvular paroxysmal AF. Results: Eleven patients (8.5%) had an LCPV (ostium maximal average diameter: 27.5 ± 4.9 mm, ostium minimal average diameter: 17.7 ± 3.5 mm). Nine out of 11 (81.8%) LCPVs were successfully occluded and isolated at the ostium with a VGLA guided PVI. The ablation procedure time was significantly shorter in the patients with than without an LCPV (61.5 ± 15.4 vs. 86.9 ± 32.9 min, p = 0.01). There was no difference regarding the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence between those with and without an LCPV (p = 0.18). A total of fifteen patients underwent a redo procedure, but reconnections were not observed in any of the LCPV patients. Conclusion: The VGLA guided PVI was a useful therapeutic tool even in patients with an LCPV. The presence of an LCPV was not associated with any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

Introduction: Detailed clinical outcomes of cryoballoon ablation of the left atrial (LA) posterior wall (LAPW) in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been fully examined. Methods: We analyzed the outcomes of 191 patients with non-paroxysmal AF, of whom 135 underwent cryoballoon ablation of the LAPW including the LA roof in addition to pulmonary vein isolation with a cryoballoon. Results: Complete conduction block at the LA roof was obtained in 97.0% (131/135) of patients and LAPW was isolated in 85.2% (115/135) of patients. Over 372 days (range, 182–450 days) of follow-up, atrial arrhythmia recurrence was observed in 55 (40.7%) patients, and atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence accounted for 25.5% of cases. The prevalence of LA roof cryoballoon ablation tended to be higher in patients without recurrence than those with (74.3% vs. 61.8%, respectively; p=0.11), especially those with persistent AF recurrence (74.5% vs. 46.2%, p=0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that cryoballoon ablation of the LA roof was a predictor of freedom from persistent AF recurrence and that it was not associated with AT recurrence. Durable LA roof lesions were confirmed in 18 (72.0%) of 25 patients who underwent redo ablation. Conclusion: Cryoballoon ablation of the LAPW leads to a sufficient acute success rate of complete conduction block and durable lesions of the LA roof without increasing the risk of AT recurrence. The prevalence of persistent AF recurrence decreases after additional cryoballoon ablation of the LAPW in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Introduction: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) with a balloon-based visually guided laser ablation (VGLA) is a useful tool for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), however, phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is an important complication. We investigated the predictors of developing PNI during VGLA. Methods and Results: This study included 130 consecutive patients who underwent an initial VGLA of non-valvular paroxysmal AF. During the ablation of the right-sided pulmonary veins, continuous and stable right phrenic nerve pacing was performed, and the compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) were recorded. Twenty patients developed PNI during the PVI. The patients who suffered from PNI had a significantly larger right superior PV (RSPV) ostium area (284.7 ± 47.0 mm2 vs. 233.1 ± 46.4 mm2, P < 0.01) than that of the other patients. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that the area under the curve of the RSPV ostial area was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.90) with an optimal cut-off point of 238.0 mm2 (sensitivity: 0.58, specificity: 0.95). In the multivariate analyses, large RSPV ostial area (HR 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.03, P < 0.01) and small balloon size (HR 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.53-0.98, P = 0.03) were independent risk factors for PNI. PNI remained in 13 patients after the procedure, but 12 of those patients recovered from PNI during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The incidence of PNI during the VGLA was relatively high, but the PNI improved in the majority of cases. During the VGLA, a large RSPV and small balloon size were predictors of PNI.