loading page

Toward Forecasting Groundwater Table in Flood Prone Coastal Cities Using Long Short-term Memory and Recurrent Neural Networks
  • +2
  • Benjamin Bowes,
  • Jonathan Goodall,
  • Jeffrey Sadler,
  • Mohamed Morsy,
  • Madhur Behl
Benjamin Bowes
University of Virginia

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jonathan Goodall
University of Virginia Main Campus
Author Profile
Jeffrey Sadler
University of Virginia
Author Profile
Mohamed Morsy
University of Virginia Main Campus
Author Profile
Madhur Behl
University of Virginia
Author Profile

Abstract

Coastal cities face recurrent flooding from storm events and rising seas. A contributing factor to flooding in these low relief areas is the groundwater table, which, already relatively shallow, can quickly rise towards the land surface during storm events. This leads to increased surface runoff entering stormwater drainage systems and a greater probability of flooding. As such, groundwater table forecasts could be an important component of real-time flood forecasting systems, but are generally unavailable. Because traditional physics-based models require extensive amounts of subsurface data that is difficult to obtain, especially in urban environments, this research evaluates two types of machine learning models, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Long Short-term Memory neural networks (LSTM), for creating groundwater table forecasts. The two types of networks were built with Tensorflow/Keras to forecast the groundwater table response to forecasted storm events and appropriate hyperparameters were tuned using the Hyperas library. Using observed hourly groundwater levels, rainfall, and tide from the City of Norfolk, Virginia, the networks were trained with data from 2010-2016 and tested with data from 2016-2018. Archived forecast rainfall and tide from two large storms in the test period (Hurricane Hermine and Tropical Storm Julia) were then used to evaluate the effect of forecast inputs on model performance. Results indicate that LSTM is slightly more accurate when forecasting the groundwater table than RNN, likely because of its increased ability to preserve and learn from past information. Average root mean squared error and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency values for an 18hr forecast for the LSTM were 0.06m and 0.89, respectively, and 0.07m and 0.85, respectively, for the RNN. These forecasts could provide valuable information to aid in planning and response to storm events and will become an increasingly important part of effectively modeling and predicting coastal urban flooding as sea level rises.