Open Access Dissertations in University Repositories:
The Shift to NoQuest or Proquest-optional Policies among American Institutions
The ubiquity of academic scholarship on the Internet and the ready availability of rich online digital media provide superior methods to broadly disseminate and responsibly preserve doctoral dissertations. Management and discovery of dissertations via Open Access repositories, combined with unfettered global distribution via scholarly sharing networks, offer far greater exposure, access to, and the potential for reuse of electronic theses and dissertations. Institution decision makers interested in reviewing the many benefits of open ETDs in Open Access repositories may find the associated reading list of interest.
Updated List of Institutions Promoting Open Access Dissertations
The following American universities prefer ETD access from open access repositories. Research has shown that Universities that have shifted away from a ProQuest/UMI mandate see a precipitous decline in student uptake of that service (Potvin, 2012).
Note that the universities with NoQuest or Proquest-optional policies are all heavy-hitters in terms of research output and scholarly impact. Their institutional status is noted below in terms of Carnegie Classification; top ranking in graduate program size (according to NSF's Science and Engineering Doctorates Report 2014) and membership in the prestigious Association of American Universities.
This list continues to grow
Please feel free to add a comment to let us know of any schools we’ve missed!
Massachusetts Institute of Technology : Abstract only goes to PQ
University of Houston All schools with exception of Business and Liberal Arts & Sciences do not require PQ