authorea.com/104991

Can lateral inhibition give rise to periodic developmental patterns?

Multicellular organisms construct complex morphological structures in an extremely reproducible manner. Reproducibility, in part, is achieved by expressing the right developmental gene in the right pattern. Even so, not all patterns are predetermined. Some patterns arise by cell-cell interaction in a stochastic manner. One such cellular interaction mode is termed ‘lateral inhibition’.

In this mode, each cell interacts only with its neighboring cells. Each cell expresses an inhibitory surface molecule called *Delta* and its cognate receptor molecule *Notch*. *Delta* expression is driven by a pro-differentiation transcription factor called *Senseless*. Conversely, *Notch* activation, by the *Delta* molecule of a neighboring cell, leads to down-regulation of *Senseless*. Thus cells compete to increase their *Senseless* expression while shutting down *Senseless* production in their immediate neighbors. Within a competent group of cells, the individual cell with the highest *Senseless* expression is selected to differentiate into a sensory organ ((Nolo 2000) and references therein).

Lateral inhibition has been used to justify the emergence of periodic patterns of sensory organs that arise in many contexts. One such context is the fruit fly anterior wing margin. Here, around 20-22 chemosensory organs arise in a robust periodic pattern such that every 5th cell in a 1-D row is a sensory organ. The aim of this project is to determine if the dynamics of lateral inhibition can indeed explain the emergence of periodic patterns, and specifically the periodicity of every 5th cell differentiating observed in the fly wing. And if so, how might the period be controlled?

We consider a 1D row of cells representing cells on the fruit fly anterior wing margin. We model the dynamics of *Senseless* \(S_j\), *Delta* \(D_j\), and activated *Notch* \(N_j\), where \(j\) is the cell index. An externally-imposed inductance signal is given by \(I\), which is taken to be constant. \[\begin{aligned}
\frac{d S_j}{dT} &= -k_1 S_i + k_2 I F(N_j), \qquad &F(N) \in [0,1], \ F'(N) < 0,\\
\frac{d D_j}{dT} &= -k_3 D_i + k_4 G(S_j), \qquad &G(S) \in [0,\infty), \ G'(S) > 0, \\
\frac{d N_j}{dT} &= -k_5 N_i + k_3 \bar{D}_j, \qquad &\bar{D}_j = (D_{j-1} + D_{j+1})/2.
\end{aligned}\] This model is based on the following assumptions:

*Senseless*\(S_j\) is removed from the system at rate \(k_1\) due to degradation.*Senseless*\(S_j\) is transcribed at a rate that is proportional to the inductance signal \(I\) and a decreasing function of the activated*Notch*\(F(N_j)\). It is believed that*Senseless*transcription is highly sensitive to the amount of bound*Notch*, so it is plausible that \(F\) is sigmoidal (i.e. \(F(N) = 1/(1+e^{a(N-N_c)})\)), where increasing \(a\) increases sensitivity, and \(N_c\) is the amount of*Notch*where*Senseless*transcription starts to become affected.*Delta*is lost at a rate \(k_3\) due to*Notch*binding with adjacent cells. We assume that the amount of unbound*Notch*on adjacent cells is at equilibrium (i.e., when*Notch*becomes bound, it is immediately replaced).*Delta*is transcribed at a rate that is proportional to an increasing function of the amount of*Senseless*, \(G(S_j)\).Activated

*Notch*is lost at a rate \(k_5\) due to degradation, which may occur after the regulatory subunit performs its action in the cell nucleus.*Notch*is activated at a rate proportional to the average of*Delta*in the neighboring cells, \(\bar{D}_j = (D_{j-1} + D_{j+1})/2\). The rate parameter is chosen to be \(k_3\) so that, over a given interval of time, the amount of*Delta*lost by all cells due to*Notch*binding is equal to the amount activated*Notch*that is created.

In order to determine analytically which periodicities are most linearly-unstable, we conduct a Fourier analysis. For this we take the Fourier ansatz \[\begin{aligned} (S_j, D_j, N_j)^T = (\tilde{S}_h, \tilde{D}_h, \tilde{N}_h)^T + (\tilde{S}_j, \tilde{D}_j, \tilde{N}_j)^T e^{\omega t} e^{i k j},\end{aligned}\] where \((\tilde{S}_h, \tilde{D}_h, \tilde{N}_h)^T\) is a spatially homogeneous steady state solution to the system and \(k\) is the Fourier wavenumber. Plugging this ansatz in to the system gives the eigenvalue problem \(\omega \vec{\xi} = J \vec{\xi}\) at linear order, where \(J\) is the Jacobian matrix of the system linearized about the homogeneous steady state. By solving for the largest eigenvalue of \(J\), we find that modes of \(k = \pi/2, \pi, 3\pi/2, ...\) are most unstable, which correspond to periodicities of two and four. In numerical simulations we have observed the 2-periodic pattern but not the 4-periodic pattern. Also it appears that a 5-periodic pattern cannot be most unstable in any parameter regime.

From our analysis, it appears that the preliminary model does not easily account for the higher periodicities that are observed in the anterior wing margin. It is possible that the preliminary model does not capture a key biological mechanism that is required to generate these periodicities. It has been experimentally observed in *C. elegans* that some *Delta* homologs do not have a transmembrane domain and thus can be secreted by cells, so that they are free floating and are not bound to any membrane. Further, these secreted ligands are functionally equivalent to the membrane bound homologs (Chen 2004). We capture this phenomenon by including non-local terms where some fraction of *Delta* molecules can be secreted. These are then free to bind to non-adjacent cells’ receptors and inhibit *Senseless* production in cells further away.

We modify two terms in the preliminary model: one in the *Notch* equation to account for the non-local *Delta* binding and another in the *Delta* equation to account for the loss of *Delta* due to this binding. It is not clear what non-local kernel should be used to describe the likelihood of secreted *Delta* binding to cells of some distance away, since it is not biologically known how secreted *Delta* propagates. We restricted our numerical study to symmetric kernels which decay away from the origin.

In our numerical simulations, we observed that fast-decaying kernels, such as ones that go as \(1/r^2\), reproduce the two-cell period seen in the preliminary model (Figure 1). We believe that the effect of non-locality is minimal in this case. However, for kernels which decay more slowly, such as kernels which decay linearly, higher periodicities of 4, 5, and 6 appear in the numerical simulations (Figure 2).

We conclude that our idealization of lateral inhibition is unable to produce the periodicities that are observed in the fruit fly anterior wing margin, and hypothesize that an additional mechanism or molecule is needed to generate a 5-periodic pattern. Since the 2-periodic pattern appears most robustly in both our original model formulation and a plausible modification, we wonder whether it is possible that the initial pattern is in fact every other cell and later events (such as cell division) produce the higher period we see in the adult.

Alternatively, our model modifications suggest that a secreted ligand can generate a 5-periodicity, and we suggest further investigation of *Delta* secretion in the wing margin. There is also evidence for other secreted inhibitors acting during sensory organ specification such as *Scabrous*, a short range inhibitor (Lee 2000) (Renaud 2001). Similarly *Fringe* is expressed in the wing margin and is capable of modifying *Delta* potency for *Notch* activation (Brückner 2000). Although *Fringe* is a secreted molecule, it is unclear if its effects on *Notch* signaling are mediated by extracellular *Fringe* or are cell-autonomous. Nevertheless, it would be worthwhile to investigate if *Scabrous* or *Fringe* have a role in periodic pattern formation.

## Share on Social Media