loading page

Using fish-based biological index to indicate eco-environmental status along the longitudinal gradient of a subtropical river
  • +10
  • Sai Wang,
  • Shi-Di Fan,
  • En-Ni Wu,
  • De-Lin Xu,
  • Tuan-Tuan Wang,
  • Dong-Hai Wu,
  • Yong-Duo Song,
  • Hong-Jin Zhang,
  • Guo-Ping Fu,
  • Zhong-Bing Chen,
  • Zhi-Qiang Guo,
  • Yang Zhang,
  • Zhuo-Luo Ma
Sai Wang
Hainan University
Author Profile
Shi-Di Fan
Hainan University
Author Profile
En-Ni Wu
Hainan University
Author Profile
De-Lin Xu
MEE Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences
Author Profile
Tuan-Tuan Wang
Hainan University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Dong-Hai Wu
Hainan University
Author Profile
Yong-Duo Song
Hainan University
Author Profile
Hong-Jin Zhang
Hainan University
Author Profile
Guo-Ping Fu
Hainan University
Author Profile
Zhong-Bing Chen
Mondelez Czech Republic sro
Author Profile
Zhi-Qiang Guo
Hainan University
Author Profile
Yang Zhang
Yaneng Biotechnology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd
Author Profile
Zhuo-Luo Ma
Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co Ltd
Author Profile

Abstract

River ecosystems are facing a deepening biodiversity crisis. Developing robust biotic indicators to assess ecological status across large spatial scales are important. In the subtropical Liuxi River of southern China, 34 fish indicators, including 4 genera and 30 species, were selected from 108 fish species by linear discriminant analysis. These indicators were combined into 18 groups and assigned scores according to their species-specific requirements for food resources and habitat patterns. The ecological and trophic functioning of optimized indicators can reflect not only the community diversity and food web properties but also the environmental quality of the ecosystem. Three formulas for calculating the index of fish indicators ( IFI) were developed based on the scoring of each indicator and weighted by relative abundance (individual number, i.e., IFIN) and relative biomass (wet weight, i.e., IFIB). Spearman correlation analysis showed that IFIB exhibited a more powerful explanation of biodiversity and environmental factors than IFIN and unweighted IFI. Therefore, we conclude that IFIB has absolute advantages in constructing an indicator-based environmental evaluation system since it contains comprehensive information on biology and ecology. In the future, the application of indicator scoring methods can contribute greatly to the conservation and development of aquatic ecosystems.