Deep science, creative science: Patient brooding versus
evidence-reason-based techniques
Abstract
It may seem odd to assert that patient brooding and waiting for
imaginative validation is the proper way of doing science; after all,
most professional scientists and philosophers believe that the essence
of science is ‘evidence’ derived from observations and experiments,
synthesized by some kind of logical and rational method. But personal
experience, history and theoretical considerations all suggest that a
prolonged state of ‘patient brooding’ is the hallmark and prerequisite
of ‘deep science’; a practical necessity for the most creative and
significant breakthroughs.