Science is fundamentally self-regulated by the integrity of individual
scientists: therefore young scientists must develop their personal
qualities, as well as learning their subject
Abstract
The validity of science depends on the integrity of the individual
scientist. It is often supposed that science is a distinctive process or
system externally regulating the individual scientist; an assumption
that science is a mechanism into-which data and ideas are fed and
from-which valid knowledge emerges. By this view, the individual
scientist is not crucial because individual errors, inabilities and
(even) dishonesty are all eliminated by various feedback processes. This
conceptualisation of science provides individual ‘scientists’ with a
free pass to relax the strictness and purity of their personal honesty
and motivations. But all and any possible external systems ultimately
require the integrity of individuals, and inner integrity cannot be
imposed but most come from within. When individuals concerned with
science lack personal integrity then other lower, commoner and more
powerful motivations will take-over science. The implication is that
when a young scientist is learning to be a scientist he cannot simply
learn the subject but must also be working on his own personal
development: he must develop integrity until it becomes an iron law. In
particular he must develop the understanding that: 1. Truth must become
an inflexible habit; 2. Science is spiritual; 3. Truth is a transcendent
value; 4. Science is not a methodology, but an attitude, a motivation, a
way of being; 5. The proper attitude of a scientist to his subject is a
kind of love, a devotion to the phenomenon of which understanding is
being sought. Therefore, science must be dominated by honest individuals
of indestructible integrity. When individual scientists lack or lose
self-motivated integrity, then science simply ceases to be.