loading page

Clinical Utility of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening for Rare Chromosome Abnormalities in Singleton Pregnancies
  • +9
  • Ting Hu,
  • Jiamin Wang,
  • Qian Zhu,
  • zhu zhang,
  • Rui Hu,
  • Like Xiao,
  • Yunyuan Yang,
  • Na Liao,
  • Sha Liu,
  • He Wang,
  • Xiaoyu Niu,
  • Shanling Liu
Ting Hu
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jiamin Wang
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Qian Zhu
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
zhu zhang
Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital
Author Profile
Rui Hu
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Like Xiao
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Yunyuan Yang
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Na Liao
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Sha Liu
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
He Wang
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile
Xiaoyu Niu
Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital
Author Profile
Shanling Liu
West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To systematically investigate the clinical utility of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) commercially used for the common fetal aneuploidies as a prenatal screening tool for rare chromosome abnormalities (RCAs). Design: Prospective study. Setting: Hospital-based. Population or Sample: 528 gravidas with positive NIPS results for RCAs. Methods: Gravidas with positive NIPS results for RCAs subsequently underwent amniocentesis for single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-array) were recruit. The degrees of concordance between NIPS and SNP-array were classified into full concordance, partial concordance, discordance related and discordance. Main Outcome Measures: The positive predictive values (PPVs) for rare aneuploidies and segmental imbalances, while incidental findings for regions of homozygosity/uniparental disomy (ROH/UPD), were used to evaluate the performance of NIPS. Results: Of the 528 gravidas with positive NIPS results, 29.2% were confirmed with positive prenatal SNP-array results (154/528). The PPVs for rare aneuploidies and segmental imbalances were 6.1% (7/115) and 21.1% (87/413), respectively. ROH/UPDs, as incidental findings, have been identified in 9.5% (50/528) of gravidas with positive NIPS results. The PPV for clinical significant findings was 8.9% (47/528), including 7 cases with mosaic rare aneuploidies, 35 with pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variants, and 5 with imprinting disorders. Conclusions: NIPS commercially used for the common fetal aneuploidies yielded low PPV for rare aneuploidies, moderate PPV for segmental imbalances, and incidental findings for ROH/UPD. For the low PPV for clinical significant findings, NIPS has limited clinical utility for RCAs. Prenatal SNP-array should be regarded as the first-tier test for positive NIPS, particularly for those involved imprinted chromosomes.