Background. Food allergy (FA) is associated with poor quality of life and high levels of psychological distress. Psychological support is therefore extremely important but is not always available. As part of the Global Access to Psychological Services for Food Allergy (GAPS) Study, we aimed to assess distress and use of psychological services for adults with food allergy. Methods. Participants (n=1329 adults with FA) from >20 countries were recruited through patient organisations, social media adverts and online survey panels to complete an online survey. Surveys were offered in six languages. Results. A total of 67.7% of adults reported they had experienced FA-related psychological distress with the biggest issue being anxiety about having an allergic reaction (64.1%). Only 19.4% had been assessed for FA-related psychological distress; 22.9% had seen a mental health professional for treatment for their FA-related distress. There were significant differences across countries for levels of distress, screening for distress, seeing a mental health professional and being diagnosed with a FA-related mental health disorder (all p<0.001). The UK and Brazil had the highest number of adults reporting distress. The biggest barriers to seeing a mental health professional were cost, lack of insurance coverage, failure to provide a referral, and lack of practitioner in the area. Conclusions. FA-related distress is common in adults. Few have accessed the psychological care and support they need and there is significant variability across countries. Clinicians should consider routine assessment of adults for distress and easily accessible resources are needed to help support adult patients.

Background: The effect of race, age, sex, atopy, environmental exposures, and social determinants of health on total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) has not been examined in children with food allergy. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis with univariable and multivariable linear mixed effect models of data from 398 African American and European American children 0-12 years with allergist-diagnosed food allergy from the multi-center, observational cohort FORWARD; total serum IgE in kU/L was the primary outcome measure. Results: Total serum IgE positively associated with African American race ( p < .0001), older age ( p < .0001), male sex ( p =. 0142), lower household income ( p = .0051), lower parent/caregiver education ( p = .0051), allergic rhinitis ( p < .0001), asthma ( p < .0001), eczema ( p = .0240), and a higher number of food allergies ( p < .0001), but not tobacco smoke exposure. After covariate adjustment in multivariable analysis, total serum IgE remained higher in African American than European American ( p < .0001), older than younger ( p < .0001), and male than female children and in children with allergic rhinitis ( p = .0083), asthma ( p < .0001), eczema ( p = .0140), and a higher number of food allergies ( p < .0001). Conclusions: We provide foundational data that total serum IgE varies by race in children with food allergy; values were higher in African American than European American children, independent of atopic status. These findings call attention to the need to establish race-dependent values of total serum IgE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.

Food Allergy (FA) is now one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood often lasting throughout life and leading to significant worldwide healthcare burden. The precise mechanisms responsible for the development of this inflammatory condition are largely unknown; however, a multifactorial aetiology involving both environmental and genetic contributions is well accepted. A precise understanding of the pathogenesis of FA is an essential first step to developing comprehensive prevention strategies that could mitigate this epidemic. As it is frequently preceded by atopic dermatitis and can be prevented by early antigen introduction, the development of FA is likely facilitated by the improper initial presentation of antigen to the developing immune system. Primary oral exposure of antigens allowing for presentation via a well-developed mucosal immune system, rather than through a disrupted skin epidermal barrier, is essential to prevent FA. In this review, we present the data supporting the necessity of 1) an intact epidermal barrier to prevent epicutaneous antigen presentation, 2) the presence of specific commensal bacteria to maintain an intact mucosal immune system and 3) maternal/infant diet diversity, including vitamins and minerals, and appropriately timed allergenic food introduction to prevent FA.

Food Allergy (FA) is now one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood often lasting throughout life and leading to significant worldwide healthcare burden. The precise mechanisms responsible for the development of this inflammatory condition are largely unknown; however, a multifactorial aetiology involving both environmental and genetic contributions is well accepted. A precise understanding of the pathogenesis of FA is an essential first step to developing comprehensive prevention strategies that could mitigate this epidemic. As it is frequently preceded by atopic dermatitis and can be prevented by early antigen introduction, the development of FA is likely facilitated by the improper initial presentation of antigen to the developing immune system. Primary oral exposure of antigens allowing for presentation via a well-developed mucosal immune system, rather than through a disrupted skin epidermal barrier, is essential to prevent FA. In this review, we present the data supporting the necessity of 1) an intact epidermal barrier to prevent epicutaneous antigen presentation, 2) the presence of specific commensal bacteria to maintain an intact mucosal immune system and 3) maternal/infant diet diversity, including vitamins and minerals, and appropriately timed allergenic food introduction to prevent FA.

Racial Differences in Timing of Food Allergen IntroductionAudrey Brewer, MD MPH 1; Jialing Jiang, BA2; Christopher M. Warren, PhD 2; Hemant P. Sharma, MD, MHS 3; Mary C. Tobin, MD4; Amal Assa’ad, MD 5; Ruchi S. Gupta, MD MPH 1,2* on behalf of the FORWARD Team1. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States3. Children’s National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, United States4. Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States5. Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States