Meron Kifle

and 4 more

Objective: To compare the prognostic performance of biomarkers soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1), Placental Growth Factor (PIGF), and sFlt-1/PIGF ratio as continuous values or as a binary cut-off of 38 for predicting preeclampsia (PE) within 7 days. Design: Observational study using a clinical trial data Setting: Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom (UK). Population: Pregnant women between 24+0 to 37+0 weeks of gestation with a clinical suspicion of preeclampsia. Main outcome: Onset of preeclampsia within seven days of the initial biomarker test. Methods: Logistic regression models for (i) sFlt-1 (ii) PlGF, (iii) sFlt-1/PlGF ratio (continuous), and (iv) sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a cut-off above or below 38. Results: Of the total 370 women, 42 (11.3%) developed PE within seven days of screening. Models with sFlt-1 and sFlt-1/PIGF ratio (continuous) had greater overall performance than models with PIGF or with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a cut-off at 38 (R2: sFlt-1=55%, PIGF=38%, sFlt-1/PIGF ratio=57%, sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as cut-off at 38 model=46%). The discriminative performance was highest in the models with sFlt-1 (c-statistic=0.94) and sFlt-1/PIGF ratio (continuous) (c-statistic=0.94) compared to PIGF model (c-statistic=0.87) or sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off at 38 (c-statistic=0.88). Conclusion: Models using values of continuous sFlt-1/PIGF ratio or sFlt-1 only had better predictive performance compared to a PIGF only model or the model with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as a cut-off at 38. Further studies based on a larger sample size are warranted to substantiate this finding.

Samuel Dockree

and 5 more

Objective To define a trimester-specific reference interval for C-reactive protein (CRP) in healthy pregnant women, and to evaluate its accuracy for diagnosing infection. Design Retrospective cross-sectional and diagnostic accuracy study. Setting Tertiary hospital in Oxford, UK. Population Development cohort: 315 pregnant women from the Oxford Pregnancy Biobank with uncomplicated pregnancies, with longitudinal sampling in each trimester. Evaluation cohort: 50 pregnant women with suspected chorioamnionitis. Methods and main outcome measures We calculated a 95% reference interval for CRP in each trimester and evaluated its diagnostic accuracy for infection compared to that from current guidance (≤7 mg/L). Results Of the 315 healthy pregnant women in our study, concentrations of CRP were substantially higher than those in most non-pregnant populations. The reference intervals in each trimester were similar, with an upper reference limit of 18 mg/L. CRP increased log-linearly with body mass index in all trimesters (p<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of CRP for diagnosing chorioamnionitis were 80% and 86%, respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy using the pregnancy-specific reference interval was significantly greater than that of the existing standard (p=0.002). Conclusions A pregnancy-specific reference interval for CRP should be used to optimise diagnostic accuracy for infection in pregnant women. Chorioamnionitis was used as example of a localised infection with well-defined outcomes, but pregnancy-specific upper reference limits for CRP should be considered in any clinical setting including pregnant women.