loading page

Patient outcomes after the implementation of a decolonisation protocol in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement
  • +6
  • Miguel Ángel Amor García,
  • Almudena Ribed,
  • Pablo Sanz-Ruiz,
  • Alejandra Melgarejo-Ortuño,
  • CARMEN RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ,
  • Mar Sanchez-Somolinos,
  • José Antonio Matas-Díaz,
  • ANA HERRANZ-ALONSO,
  • MARIA SANJURJO-SAEZ
Miguel Ángel Amor García
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Almudena Ribed
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
Pablo Sanz-Ruiz
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
Alejandra Melgarejo-Ortuño
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
CARMEN RODRIGUEZ-GONZALEZ
HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑON
Author Profile
Mar Sanchez-Somolinos
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
José Antonio Matas-Díaz
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
ANA HERRANZ-ALONSO
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile
MARIA SANJURJO-SAEZ
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Author Profile

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives Surgical-site infections (SSI) are associated with increases in hospital length of stay and hospitalization costs and patient’s poor quality of life. Eradication of S. aureus with nasal mupirocin could decrease the incidence of SSI by this pathogen. The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the incidence of SSI before and after the implementation of a decolonisation program in orthopaedic patients. Methods A pre-post intervention study was conducted. A multidisciplinary group elaborated and implemented a standard procedure for nasal decolonisation, including a pharmacy visit. The proportion of patients who had a SSI and those infected by S. aureus were the primary outcome variables. The proportion of pre-screened patients, nasal carriers, and adequate prophylaxis (3 mupirocin applications) and decolonisation (5 applications) were recorded to analyse program implementation. Mupirocin resistance or adverse effect were also registered. Results 1,192 patients were included in the study (599 pre- and 593 post-intervention group) SSI were recorded in 2.5% vs 2.0% of patients (pre vs post-intervention), showing a relative risk (RR) of 0.81 (p=0.58). S. aureus infections were recorded in 0.7% vs 0.3% (p=0.420, RR=0.51). 59.2% vs 3.5% of patients were pre-screened (p<0.001). 63 patients (17.9%) were nasal carriers of S. aureus, of which 58 (92.1%) received an adequate prophylaxis and 32 (50.8%) an adequate decolonisation. No infection was reported regarding patients who received adequate nasal prophylaxis. Conclusions The nasal prophylaxis and decolonisation protocol were implemented in the orthopaedic patient flow. Eradication of S. aureus with nasal mupirocin seem to decrease the incidence of S. aureus infections.