I resigned from my postdoctoral position at Harvard two months ago. My academic career was fairly typical. I spent the last twelve years doing research. After college, I worked at CERN for a few years, then pursued a Ph.D. at UCLA and a 3-year Postdoc at Harvard. During my Ph.D. and Postdoc I did not even apply to a single tenure-track job. Why? My research background is very (maybe, way too) interdisciplinary: B.Sc. in Astronomy, M.Sc. in Computer Science, at CERN I did Data Science (basically working in Tim Berners-Lee former group), my Ph.D. is in Information Science, and my Postdoc in Astrophysics. Who the hell is going to hire me? While many praise academic interdisciplinarity as an asset, at the end of the day to get tenured you need to be able to teach core classes in one discipline. So, even though I was working in an amazing research group and my publication record was just fine, I decided to leave.
Leaving a postdoc at a top institution was a hard and risky decision to make. Yet, with so many PhDs and postdocs leaving academia today, I certainly don’t feel alone. But, how common (or rare) is it to leave academia? Last week I attended the ScienceOnline conference and in a session called Alternative careers in science, Eva Amsen discussed the infographic below.
The good news is that not all scholars leaving academia today are turning their back on academia. Sure, there is some backlash against the tenure system, research funding, and academic publishing (see “I say everyone should just raise a middle finger to the academic establishment” etc). This is for a reason. Many parts of the academic machine are notoriously broken. This is no secret. But rather than complaining and leaving, I like to have a more optimistic and solution-driven approach. With my friend Nate, and some other talented scholars we started Authorea, a collaborative writing environment for scientific research — a hybrid between Github and Google Docs for science. Our underlying motivation is to make s