loading page

Outcomes of Proton Therapy to Infradiaphragmatic Sites in Pediatric Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • +10
  • Cecilia Jiang,
  • Michele Kim,
  • Xiaoyan Han,
  • Monica Chelius,
  • Travis Hoover,
  • Leslie Kersun,
  • Anne F. Reilly,
  • Harper Hubbeling,
  • Elizabeth Cummings,
  • Goldie Kurtz,
  • Christine Hill-Kayser,
  • John Plastaras,
  • Michael LaRiviere
Cecilia Jiang
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Michele Kim
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Xiaoyan Han
University of Pennsylvania Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
Author Profile
Monica Chelius
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Travis Hoover
University of Maryland
Author Profile
Leslie Kersun
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Author Profile
Anne F. Reilly
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Author Profile
Harper Hubbeling
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Elizabeth Cummings
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Goldie Kurtz
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Christine Hill-Kayser
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
John Plastaras
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology
Author Profile
Michael LaRiviere
University of Pennsylvania Department of Radiation Oncology

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Background: Proton therapy (PT) has potential advantages in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (pHL). However, there is limited data on PT, specifically to infradiaphragmatic targets. We report on PT planning details, doses achieved to organs at risk (OARs), and clinical and toxicity outcomes for patients with pHL who received PT to infradiaphragmatic regions. Methods: This is a retrospective study including patients treated between 2011-2022. Demographic and clinical factors were collected, and toxicity was reported using CTCAE version 5.0. Dosimetric and clinical factors associated with key outcomes were assessed via Cox regression. Photon plans were generated for all patients, and the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank sum test were used for dosimetric comparisons. Results: Twenty-one patients comprising 22 PT courses were included. Median follow-up was 5.0 years and mean age was 14.2 years. Median dose was 21 Gray equivalent (GyE) over 14 fractions. Top acute grade 1 (G1) toxicities included fatigue (59%) and anorexia (36%). Rates of acute G2 and G3+ toxicity were 18% and 0%, respectively. After PT, no local or marginal failures occurred. 5% experienced disease progression which were all successfully salvaged, and all patients were alive and disease-free at last follow-up. No secondary malignancies developed. Compared to photon radiation, PT achieved significantly lower doses to the bowels, stomach, spleen, pancreatic tail, liver, and kidneys. Conclusions: PT is well-tolerated and leads to excellent oncologic and toxicity outcomes with long-term follow-up. PT confers dosimetric advantages when compared to photons.