loading page

OUTCOMES OF RELAPSED FAVORABLE HISTOLOGY WILMS TUMOR IN NON-CLINICAL TRIAL SETTING
  • +7
  • Netta Schneller,
  • Najat Daw,
  • Whitney Throckmorton,
  • Elizabeth Mullen,
  • Kylene DeSmith,
  • Leo Mascarenhas,
  • Cameron O’Connell,
  • Conrad Fernandez,
  • Kathryn Sutton,
  • Rajkumar Venkatramani
Netta Schneller
Texas Children's Cancer Center and Hematology Centers

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Najat Daw
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Children's Cancer Hospital
Author Profile
Whitney Throckmorton
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Children's Cancer Hospital
Author Profile
Elizabeth Mullen
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Kylene DeSmith
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Department of Pediatric Oncology
Author Profile
Leo Mascarenhas
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Author Profile
Cameron O’Connell
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Author Profile
Conrad Fernandez
Dalhousie University Department of Pediatrics
Author Profile
Kathryn Sutton
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center
Author Profile
Rajkumar Venkatramani
Texas Children's Cancer Center and Hematology Centers
Author Profile

Abstract

Background The last major North American cooperative group clinical trial for relapsed favorable histology Wilms tumor (FHWT) was completed in 2002. The outcomes of patients with relapsed Wilms tumor subsequently treated outside of clinical trials is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of salvage therapies used for patients with FHWT suffering first relapse. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated for first relapse of FHWT at six large North American institutions from January 2002 through August 2018. Results Ninety-four patients were identified. Thirty-six patients were classified as standard-risk relapse (SRR), 49 patients as high-risk relapse (HRR) and seven patients as very high-risk relapse (VHRR). Twenty-one patients with SRR were treated with Regimen I. The 4-year EFS and OS for SRR was 82.4% and 93.3%, respectively, with median follow up of 72 months. Twenty-eight HRR/VHRR patients were treated with ICE therapy while 13 received NWTS5 Stratum C. No patient completed protocol therapy per stratum C; median maintenance cycles administered was 2. The 4-year EFS and OS for HRR/VHRR was 32.6% and 58.3%, respectively, with median follow up of 33 months. Conclusions Outcomes for all strata of relapsed WT patients treated in a non-clinical setting appear to have similar outcomes as historical cohorts treated on NWTS5. Improved strategies are urgently needed for HRR and VHRR relapses.