loading page

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron nucleic acid test for COVID-19 infection with real-time RT-PCR using different nasopharyngeal swabs
  • +1
  • Sujuan Li,
  • Yuanhang Zhang,
  • Peng cheng Tong,
  • Wei Yang
Sujuan Li
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Author Profile
Yuanhang Zhang
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Author Profile
Peng cheng Tong
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Author Profile
Wei Yang
Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Background: A new one SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern (VoC), Omicron, was born in a world weary of COVID-19, which anger and frustration with the pandemic was widespread, with wide-ranging negative impacts on health, social and economic well-being. The Omicron variant, which main types was BA5.2and BF.7 in China, in December 2022 to January 2023 leaded to off-target of the S and N genes, and the kits used were not adequately and independently evaluated when these agents are studied and developed. To ensure the accuracy of coronavirus test results, performance verification of commercial Real-Time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was required. Objective: We performed a clinical evaluation for two Real Time SARS-CoV-2 assay, and to verify them based on different detection reagents and different clinical specimens. Methods: We performed clinical evaluations of two existing Chinese SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR kits COVID-19 nucleic acid detection kits (e-Diagnostic Biomedical, Wuhan, China) and 2019-nCoV nucleic acid diagnostic kits (Fosun Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) using BSD ( Bondson) (Guangzhou Bondson Biotechnology Co. Ltd.;batch number 2022101), quality controls provided by the inspection center and a large number of clinically confirmed specimens. Overall, through the BDS performance verification reference product kit, It was best used to verify the performance of the reagent through a large number of clinical specimens for further verification. Results: The coincidence rate for Fosun and e-Diagnostic kits were individually 95% and 100%. Verified that the detection limit for Fosun and e-Diagnostic kits was 300copies/mL. All were below the detection limit for Fosun reagent was 300copies/mL. e-Diagnostic was 500copies/mL. Fosun had the largest CV for ORF1ab and N gene at the the detection limit concentration(4.80%,3.49%), while e-Diagnostic had the smaller (0.93%,1.10%). Negative results were tested in cross-reactivity. During the verification of clinical samples, sequencing analyses had shown that Fosun single gene miss rate was relatively high, especially ORF1ab, followed by N gene miss rate. we survey that all N genes were detected in clinical specimens, ,ORFab dropout (i.e., a negative/low result) occurred in (10.8%) of 225 Omicron variant. Conclusions: Our results endorse the use of these two commercial kits for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in China, as their clinical performance has been fully validated by a large number of clinically confirmed cases.