loading page

Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging detect subclinical recurrences after capsular dissection of parotid pleomorphic adenomas?
  • +4
  • Georgios Fyrmpas,
  • Alexandros Poutoglidis,
  • Nikolaos Tsetsos,
  • Adamantios Kilmpasanis,
  • Evropi Forozidou,
  • Konstantinos Vlachtsis,
  • Aggelos Nikolaou
Georgios Fyrmpas
Democritus University of Thrace - Alexandropoulis Campus

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Alexandros Poutoglidis
Geniko Nosokomeio Thessalonikes G Papanikolaou
Author Profile
Nikolaos Tsetsos
General Hospital of Thessaloniki G Papanikolaou
Author Profile
Adamantios Kilmpasanis
Geniko Nosokomeio Thessalonikes G Papanikolaou Iatrike Yperesia
Author Profile
Evropi Forozidou
Geniko Nosokomeio Thessalonikes G Papanikolaou
Author Profile
Konstantinos Vlachtsis
General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papanikolaou
Author Profile
Aggelos Nikolaou
General Hospital of Thessaloniki G Papanikolaou
Author Profile

Abstract

Recurrence after conservative resection of pleomorphic adenoma is a rare and late phenomenon that poses a difficult management problem. All recurrences at 6 years after capsular dissection were detected clinically (recurrence rate 3.2%). Magnetic resonance imaging failed to detect early occult recurrences after conservative surgery and thus a “single shot” imaging modality for follow up is not recommended. Regular ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging have been used after surgery for early detection of a recurrence. The pickup rate is low so the additional cost and effort of radiological surveillance is not justified. Follow up after parotid surgery for pleomorphic adenoma remains clinical. There may be a benefit in regular surveillance imaging of high risk patients (prior enucleation or resection after recurrence).