loading page

Whatever happens, two mammary is better than one
  • +1
  • Giorgia Bonalumi,
  • Ilaria Giambuzzi,
  • Roberto Lorusso,
  • Michele Di Mauro
Giorgia Bonalumi
Centro Cardiologico Monzino Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Ilaria Giambuzzi
Author Profile
Roberto Lorusso
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Author Profile
Michele Di Mauro
Maastricht UMC+
Author Profile


It is well known that the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) should be the first conduit of choice. Similarly, especially in patients younger than 70 years, other conduits should be search among arterial grafts such as right internal mammary artery (RIMA) or radial artery (RA). If the RA can be harvested in the meanwhile of LIMA harvesting without time consuming, it is well established that former one has to be grafted only on presence of a good run-off. One of the main criticisms moved to the use of RIMA are linked to technical difficulties in its harvesting it. Edgar Aranda-Michel and coworkers tried to answer to the age-old question is “RIMA has to be used in situ or free-graft?” In a retrospective study on 667 patients (442 had free RIMA and 245 had free RIMA) that were also matched through propensity analysis (202 patients per group), they did not find any differences between the two groups in the major outcomes, including heart failure specific readmissions. This finding is consistent with the literature, hence the take-home message is whatever happens, two mammary is better than one.
26 Jun 2021Submitted to Journal of Cardiac Surgery
28 Jun 2021Assigned to Editor
28 Jun 2021Submission Checks Completed
28 Jun 2021Editorial Decision: Accept
Oct 2021Published in Journal of Cardiac Surgery volume 36 issue 10 on pages 3639-3640. 10.1111/jocs.15800