A Critical Examination of the U.S. Army's Comprehensive Soldier Fitness
Program
Abstract
This article examines the U.S. Army’s Comprehensive Soldier Fitness
(CSF) program from a scientific, ethical, and pragmatic viewpoint. CSF
is one of the largest single applications of psychological research in
history, intended to develop “resilience” in every U.S. Army soldier.
I highlight several areas where the available information about the
program either suggests the likelihood of specific problems, or is
insufficient to allow the research community to evaluate the
effectiveness of CSF independently of the claims made by its originators
and assurances given by other non-disinterested parties. In particular,
I question (a) whether a program based on resiliency training for
school-aged children can hope to address the serious mental trauma,
including PTSD, faced by soldiers deployed to war zones; (b) whether the
instruments used to measure the performance of the program are reliable,
valid, and appropriate for the circumstances in which they are being
used, and (c) whether the design and delivery of the program takes
sufficient account of the conflicting real-world demands placed on the
individuals involved. I conclude that the program appears to have a
number of potentially problematic aspects that require wider scrutiny
from psychological researchers and practitioners.