Jeff Montgomery edited Intro.tex  about 9 years ago

Commit id: 40a05b399c38da25ff29deab8ef668f4d5133795

deletions | additions      

       

\section{The System as It Stands}  A study published in July 2014 collected information on contracts from  55 university and 12 consortia of libraries’ contracts libraries dealings  with academic publishing companies publishers  \cite{Bergstrom_2014}. 360 contracts were received, documenting prices and bundling of deals from 9 major publishers (including Elsevier, Springer, Wiley, ACS, and Oxford University Press). They show the results of a lack of transparency, opaque sales practices,  manipulation, and good varying degrees of  negotiation skills: publishers can  In the mid 1990s, with the shift from primarily print print-only  to increasingly  digital distribution, economic formulations changed. No longer would a research university \textit{need} to subscribe to multiple copies ofthe  in demand journals, no journals. No  longer would storage space play a significant role in decisions (estimated total (e.g. estimated  storage and maintenance cost for a 2500 page journal volume range from \$300-1000). No longer,  And publishers could now offer their whole catalog of journals (from high impact to esoterically specialized) at one discounted “Big Deal” price. In the own words of Derk Haank, then Elsevier and current Springer CEO: \begin{quote}  But what it [electronic publishing] does do is to dramatically \textbf{\textit{dramatically  lower the marginal costs of allowing access access}}  ... [It] [Cost for each new users]  is virtually nil and that means that we should be more creative in the business model.... where we make a deal with the university, the consortia or the whole country, where we say for this amount we will allow all your people to use our material, unlimited, 24 hours per day. And, basically the price then depends on a rough estimate of how useful is that product for you; and we can adjust it over time. [emphasis added]  \end{quote}  Here, “adjust it over time” means mandate an average 5-6\% price increase annually. Bergstrom, et al calculate in  their study: \begin{quote}  “A bundle whose price increased by 5.5\% per year would \textbf{double its price between 1999 and 2012}, whereas over the same period the US consumer price index rose by 38\%.” [emphasis added]