Volker Strobel edited section_Goodness_of_Fit_section__.tex  almost 8 years ago

Commit id: 053b04f5b89d0185638df5d808889443d9c20c1f

deletions | additions      

       

\section{Experiment -- Evaluation of Maps}  \label{sec:experiment-3}  \section{Experiment -- Triggered Landing}  \label{sec:experiment-4}  \begin{table}[H]  \centering  \begin{tabular}{lrrr}  \toprule  & x-position & y-position & combined\\  \midrule  Error in $cm$ & 46 & 54 & 71\\  STD in $cm$ & 56 & 71 & ...\\  \bottomrule  \end{tabular}  \caption[Triggered landings]{Results of the triggered landings}  \label{tab:targetlanding}  \end{table}  \section{Experiment -- Comparing different possible maps}  \label{sec:experiment-maps}  In Table~\ref{tab:mapeval}, the results of the map evaluation  procedure for the $N = 46$ maps are shown. 

\end{table}  \section{Experiment -- Triggered Landing}  \label{sec:experiment-4}  \begin{table}[H]  \centering  \begin{tabular}{lrrr}  \toprule  & x-position & y-position & combined\\  \midrule  Error in $cm$ & 46 & 54 & 71\\  STD in $cm$ & 56 & 71 & ...\\  \bottomrule  \end{tabular}  \caption[Triggered landings]{Results of the triggered landings}  \label{tab:targetlanding}  \end{table}  \section{Experiment -- Comparing different possible maps}  \label{sec:experiment-6}  Figure~\ref{fig:minmaximg} shows the map with the highest global loss value and the map with the lowest global loss value.