deletions | additions       diff --git a/Output.md b/Output.md  index a0c6d93..b4a38ba 100644  --- a/Output.md  +++ b/Output.md 
...
_Thanks to which system of differentiations the governing is possible?_  The product of festivals and the whole cultural field is To gain funding for  a definition of true culture. Cultural activity maintains the value of culture in general, and particular cultural activities. Jurors, awards, critiques, reviews and more or less formal discussions shape various definitions of what art is or festival one  should be and what are close to  the topics and means field  of expression appropriate politics, or within this field. Capability to gain funding  for valuable art. At the same time they define also the most fundamental problems faced by individuals and society, truly influence the dominant event organization depends on political positions  and rebel discourses, praise or criticize current social order knowledge on political field that its organizer is able to mobilize. To organize a festival one needs knowledge on artistic field  and create dreams of all of us. We could not forget about this mights of art, although from the narrow, particular point of view, this what might be win or lost relations  in thisgame is the group or personal position within the cultural  field, which might be at least to an extent of organizing  a source big number  of both social people with necessary skills  and other resources (including necessary equipment and implements) preferably for free.  The demand for free resources (free labor, free equipment and free services) is triggered by two factors: competitive pressure on  financial reward. Number budgets  of positions festivals, created by funders, and availability of free resources. There are already organizers  that are the source of able to mobilize  significant financial reward is very limited in the field resources for free, mostly thanks to their ability  of cultural production, although they exist, especially on attracting active subjects thus thanks to successful training of people who can recognize  the intersections with value of true culture (I will elaborate it later). Thus, organizations entering  the field of politics, trade and industry. festival productions have to be competitive in terms of ability to gain free resources from the social network.    In short we may say that majority Thus the system  of individuals acting differentiations that permits one to govern the others is the position  in the process network  of festival production aims relations, or the social capital,  to gain use  a position within the field term by Pierre Bourdieu. People who are able to mobilize more resources with their network are more likely to create own events, become crucial people in event production or even to influence rules  of cultural production, production. The network,  that offers them the most demanded type allows that is a product  of reward, usually appreciation as previous festivals, thus  the creator (or organizer) of true culture. Sometimes this festival itself  is an ultimate goal, both a stream of social networks’ production  andsometimes  a mean competitive effort of individuals aiming  to increase political or economic capital. accumulate as many of this relations as possible to gain better position within the field.    The audience is a crucial element in sustaining the whole game. The audience is needed as the reservoir of admiration, source of funding (direct or through taxes as taxpayers and citizens) and integral element of the network that could be made working and produce another event, for low or no remuneration (we can observe the phenomenon of well trained audience that creates so called DIY culture, see e.g. Pasquinelli 2010). The audience is the reservoir of active subjects.     The main goal of those who exercise the power over the cultural field is to to create and train the audience in recognition of value of cultural activities. It might be done through production of spectacular cultural events, without taking full responsibility for cultural education and avoiding bearing the costs. Continuous training of the audience (and potential cultural labor) would be much more time consuming and expensive, and could be avoided, because relations created with the event have some ability to reproduce (also thanks to the continuous cultural work of global computer network). Festivalisation of culture might be seen as the parallel process to neoliberal governing in different fields, although I would not like to speak about genetic relations between any of them. Certainly, all of them assume existence of free subjects, that are able to perform demanded actions on his or her own.