this is for holding javascript data
Vincent Wheeler edited section_Comparative_discussion_of_radiative__.tex
almost 8 years ago
Commit id: da404da7c2f48a5c21c1b9c94796e4651292a8e6
deletions | additions
diff --git a/section_Comparative_discussion_of_radiative__.tex b/section_Comparative_discussion_of_radiative__.tex
index faca33c..6d6b121 100644
--- a/section_Comparative_discussion_of_radiative__.tex
+++ b/section_Comparative_discussion_of_radiative__.tex
...
more reducible material per particle
\item
more dense, requires higher flow rate
\item
more material means more absorption so more concentrated irradiation is used to drive chemistry
\end{itemize}
\item
randomly porous ceria
\item
ordered, highly porous ceria
\begin{itemize}
\item
transport of oxygen into and out of solid ceria is easier
\item
lower density so easier to keep in suspension
\item
geometry may lead to high absorption per volume of ceria
\end{itemize}
\item
randomly porous ceria
\begin{itemize}
\item
marriage of the two benefits and drawbacks
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}