deletions | additions       diff --git a/Based_on_the_results_given__.tex b/Based_on_the_results_given__.tex  index 2ba8ac3..646dbba 100644  --- a/Based_on_the_results_given__.tex  +++ b/Based_on_the_results_given__.tex 
...
Based on the results given by Table 2.1, the system’s score that was given by the majority of the respondents ranged from 9.0 to 9.4, which was a good remarks to the system, but it also reflected the uncertainty of the system’s capability of giving the right and exact diagnosis and disease information based from the respondent’s opinion. Based from all the results, the findings of the study is that the system was only capable of giving an initial diagnosis based from the symptoms checked by the pediatrician that was also part of the system, disease information, and generating report as prescription. All information and in depth diagnosis could still be conducted and verified by a pediatrician. The system was useful in giving an initial diagnosis to the patient, a tool for pediatrician and medical practitioners (in case a pediatrician is not around). Even it was capable of assisting patients in terms of immediate care of the babies and children (of up to 21 years old), the system’s artificial intelligence was still young, and had plenty of rooms for improvement.