this is for holding javascript data
Lucy Chen edited Proper_science_reporting_can_take__.html
almost 8 years ago
Commit id: 4cd53ef0f1aa0f062f5a0a84fd2401808c7dc492
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Proper_science_reporting_can_take__.html b/Proper_science_reporting_can_take__.html
index 01fb3ac..da90fb5 100644
--- a/Proper_science_reporting_can_take__.html
+++ b/Proper_science_reporting_can_take__.html
...
Proper science reporting can take a while. And it should, as daily science news stories—new treatments, tests, products, and procedures—have a huge impact on consumers. While
Americans' trust in the media is at an all-time historical low, still 4 in 10 Americans trust mass media. Many journalists are accused of cutting corners, sacrificing accuracy in an attempt to push interesting (and often false) scientific findings at vulnerable
readers and even other sites
In readers.
In href="http://kill-or-cure.herokuapp.com/">Kill or cure?, Paul Battley lists Daily Mail’s "ongoing effort to classify every inanimate object into those that cause cancer and those that prevent it." Below, we've included the list of articles associated with Aspirin, which apparently both causes and prevents cancer.