deletions | additions       diff --git a/Data table.md b/Data table.md  index 6946f66..ae2ec12 100644  --- a/Data table.md  +++ b/Data table.md 
...
* NSF Ranking   * Summary: “Special Procedures and Fees for Dissertations: WPI no longer requires that Ph.D. Dissertations be microfilmed by University Microfilms, Inc. (UMI).”   16. Johns [Johns  Hopkins University University] (http://guides.library.jhu.edu/c.php?g=202613&p=1334876)  * Carnegie Class  * AAU member  * NSF Ranking   * Summary:  The Ph.D. Board policy document states that “ProQuest participation will be optional for JHU students. For some students, ProQuest adds value, so those students should be free to participate. But for other students, ProQuest represents an obstacle that should be removed.”Here at USF Tampa Bay we were also interested in who had gone ProQuestoptional   or Noquest.   During a one hour research dive in August 2012 I was able to   discover:   University of Pittsburghpublished   by the University of Pittsburgh, ProQuest   (formerly UMI/Bell & Howell), or both   http://www.pitt.edu/~graduate/etd/instructions.html   University of KentuckySelf   Publish + ProQuest   http://www.gradschool.uky.edu/CurrentStudents/theses_prep.html   University of Memphis: Self Publish beginning with the Fall 2010 semester   http://www.memphis.edu/gradschool/tdinfo.php   Auburn University: Self Publish + ProQuest   http://www.grad.auburn.edu/etd_guide.html   Virginia Tech: ETDs by Virginia Tech and ProQuest(Doctoral Students Required/   Theses Optional)   http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/   UK: University of Edinburgh   http://www.ed.ac.uk/schoolsdepartments/  academicservices/  students/postgraduateresearch/  thesissubmission   ***I apologize if I have misrepresented anyone here.   I would like to hear feedback from those who used ProQuest and are now ProQuest   optional or NoQuest:   Did you receive any backlash from your university, administration, librarians,   students, or faculty?   Did you receive any backlash from ProQuest?   Since your change in policy have you had success with the submission process?    http://sites.tdl.org/fuse/?page_id=372 6/7   ***Beginning with the Fall 2010 semester, dissertations at The   University of Memphis must be submitted to the Electronic Thesis   and Dissertation Repository (ETD).   Auburn University:   (still have not completely moved away from ProQuest)   http://etd.auburn.edu/etd/   ***The database contains a PDF version of every thesis or   dissertation successfully defended at Auburn since the Fall 2005   semester.   Virginia Tech:   (still have not completely moved away from ProQuest)   http://etd.vt.edu/etdfaq.html#faq4   ***How does UMI/ProQuest get VT ETDs?   When an electronic dissertation is approved by the Graduate School   and it becomes publicly available, an email is automatically   generated notifying UMI/ProQuest. The ETD author must have also   submitted the UMI/ProQuest form(s) and paid the appropriate fees.   In addition, I found…   Oregon State:   http://oregonstate.edu/dept/grad_school/thesis_faq.php   ***How will electronic theses and dissertations be archived and   maintained over time?   Dissertations (whether submitted in electronic or hardcopy   format)   will continue to be archived and maintained in electronic and   microfilm format by ProQuest (formerly known as UMI/Bell & Howell).   In addition, both theses and dissertations submitted in electronic   format will be archived and maintained on a University Libraries   server. The University Libraries are committed to regular updating of   archived electronic documents to ensure they continue to be   accessible to future technologies and use an open architecture for   file types and structures so that they can be more easily migrated to   future file types.   Many of these universities I list here have dual submissions, which I   hope is just a prestep   to ProQuest optional or no quest.    2/20/2015 ETDs freed here (U.S. Institutions Respecting Student Choice in Disseminating their ETDs) | Free US ETDs (FUSE)   http://sites.tdl.org/fuse/?page_id=372 7/7   Kevin Hawkins   on January 8, 2013 at 7:44 pm said:   If you have URLs documenting the decision for the original list of nine as well, it   would be great to include those as links from each institution name.   Thomas Dowling   on January 28, 2013 at 7:09 pm said:   As more schools get out of PQ, it will be vitally important that they keep their ETD   metadata plugged into larger efforts. “Those records are in our catalog” won’t be   enough. We need to play nicely with OAIPMH   harvesting projects and (dare I say   it?) Google and Google Scholar.   Lou Haines   on May 13, 2013 at 11:40 am said:   Hi Gail,   The Graduate School at Miami University (Oxford, Ohio) does not require ProQuest.   It is completely optional, and we have now moved to asking the students to get in   touch with ProQuest themselves if they wish to be included in their database or use   any of their services. Our students are required to upload their work to OhioLINK.