Wassen edited With_reviewed_papers_that_have__.html  about 8 years ago

Commit id: beb3237271af4ead9ae538293f415633be495723

deletions | additions      

       

author = {Mahmoud Chakroun and Grigore Gogu and Thomas Pacaud and Fran{\c{c}}ois Thirion},  title = {Eco-innovative design approach: Integrating quality and environmental aspects in prioritizing and solving engineering problems},  journal = {Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering}  }" data-bib-key="Chakroun_2014" contenteditable="false">Chakroun 2014 has also applied AHP in order to select their best design, however did not mention how they carried out the pairwise comparison of their criteria. class="squire-citation ltx_cite" class="ltx_cite"  data-bib-text="@incollection{Chen_2012, doi = {10.1007/978-94-007-3010-6_93},  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3010-6_93},  year = 2012, 

author = {Hsuan-Chu Chen and Jui-che Tu and Shing-Sheng Guan},  title = {Applying the Theory of Problem-Solving and {AHP} to Develop Eco-innovative Design},  booktitle = {Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society}  }" data-bib-key="Chen_2012" contenteditable="false" style="cursor: pointer"> contenteditable="false">  href="#Chen_2012">Chen 2012
 had likewise used AHP in order to select the best design out of three cases, and after ensuring that the judgement was consistent, they selected one case that ranked the highest based on their identified main and sub-criteria for the best design. One the other hand, in order to determine the optimal solution out of the three which have been generated,  ...
author = {C. H. Yeh and Jay C. Y. Huang and C. K. Yu},  title = {Integration of four-phase {QFD} and {TRIZ} in product R{\&}D: a notebook case study},  journal = {Res Eng Design}  }" data-bib-key="Yeh_2010" contenteditable="false">Yeh 2010
had three different solutions targeting one problem: to extend the battery service life of a Notebook device. However, after listing out three solutions derived from the TRIZ solution principles, they combined them into one final design that incorporates all three and thus had ended up one design. They then made an ideal comparative assessment of their final results, and in that way had determined whether it was an optimal solution or not. 

When it comes to evaluation, 










 evaluation, there were very few papers that had evaluated their design.