this is for holding javascript data
Lilia Tremou added Going_back_and_trying_to__.tex
about 8 years ago
Commit id: 454830662c72fe1fe009cd8c9d8e17f34a507ce4
deletions | additions
diff --git a/Going_back_and_trying_to__.tex b/Going_back_and_trying_to__.tex
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18853c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Going_back_and_trying_to__.tex
...
Going back and trying to do larger labels(fonts) for the axis of this plot, I made the plot redshift vs. mag .
See below. To make it clear. I got the list with >100uJy of CHILES and matched it with the Veron catalogue which
is the most complete AGN catalogue up to date. I searched with 2" offset. I found 44 sources and I plot them below.
S stands for Seyfert and Q for QSO. The number next to S goes to the Seyfert type. Most in our sample are Seyfert
type 2. The reason that the number of sources between these two plots are different is due to the different search offset. The first one is for 1"
and in the second one I searched within 2".
The old has only the sources that have X-ray flux while the new one is all the know AGN in our >100 uJy sample.
Also except for clarifying all the above i figured out that the veron catalogue (see the reference for more info)
includes a column which has flags for radio detection. They include fluxes for 1.4 GHz and 5GHz
(I need to figure out from where those fluxes are coming ) . The ineteresting part is that all of our AGNs are flagged as "N".
meaning that they have not been radio detected. I will look for more details but if you find anything
interesting regarding this let me know (i.e what surveys they use to get the radio fluxes).
I will come back with a resized labels of this plot.
