deletions | additions       diff --git a/subsection_Mass_distributions_label_sec__.tex b/subsection_Mass_distributions_label_sec__.tex  index e70165c..823f2ee 100644  --- a/subsection_Mass_distributions_label_sec__.tex  +++ b/subsection_Mass_distributions_label_sec__.tex 
...
\subsection{Mass distributions}  \label{sec:mspec}  Figure \ref{fig:massdist} plots the cumulative mass distribution functions, normalized by the survey area for five different radial bins through the galaxy. We present two representations of these data. The normalization to equal area bins mimics the binning used in \citet{Adamo_2015} to facilitate comparison with that work. That binning divides the galaxy into regions with equal area in the original optical data. The data set we analyze here does not span the full range of angles around the galaxy, though the areas are still significant fractions of the galaxy (see Figure \ref{fig:tmaxmap}). The mass distributions clearly evolve over the face of the galaxy and several of the bins show some evidence for truncation at high masses. To emphasize the changing nature of mass distributions, we also plot the distributions binned radially into groups with equal total mass ($M_{\mathrm{tot}}=1.4\times 10^{8}$). This binning shows the evolution of how the same amount of molecular gas mass is distributed in each region, with the distribution in the center of the M83 having significantly higher mass clouds than the outer disk. Of note, the mass distribution of clouds between $1.0\mathrm{~kpc} $1.0\mathrm{~kpc}  shows a truncation at the high mass end that is not seen in regions interior or exterior to this region. A similar truncation was seen in the nuclear ring region of M51 by \citet{Colombo_2014}, where the lack of high mass clouds was attributed to dynamical suppression of high mass cloud formation. Since this region includes most of the bar in M83, it is reasonable to expect that similar mechanisms are at work here.