this is for holding javascript data
fedoranna added h2_class_ltx_title_subsection_The_evolution__.html
about 8 years ago
Commit id: f045f78e2f28a6529572f65838aa6606b84c25da
deletions | additions
diff --git a/h2_class_ltx_title_subsection_The_evolution__.html b/h2_class_ltx_title_subsection_The_evolution__.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9c56fad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/h2_class_ltx_title_subsection_The_evolution__.html
...
The
evolution and maintanance of cooperation is a hotspot in biology. Since
cooperation entials a cost to cooperators therefor selfish individuals
-who are willing to reap the benenfits of cooperation but refuse to play
the cost- can exploit individuals with a cooperative dispostion. This
could lead to the collapse of cooperation. One of the key issues is how
to prevent this kind of exploitation. It is clear that communication and
information either on the intentions or about the “reputation” of
potential partners can play a cricial role in this porcess. This type of
information can be either used in partner or behavioral strategy
choice. In case partner choice individuals can decide (unilaterally or
bilaterally) whom to interact with; in case of behavioral strategy
choice individuals have an assigned partner(s) and the task of the
individual is to decide between a number of alternatives -usually to
cooperate or to not cooperate, but sometimnes with the option of
punishement. Both partner and strategy choice is a decision situation
where information about the partner can influence the decision in a
crucial way. While both of these situations are extensively studied both
in biology and in economics both by means of modelling and experiemnts,
communication is very often assumed to be honest. This assumption while
it seems to be a necessary simplification –as the majority of these
studies focus on cooperation- may result in misleading conclusions.
Communication need not be honest, not even on average () and the
question of dishonesty is most prominent in situations with conflict of
interest. Social dilamme situations are prime examples of these
scenarios thus the issue of dishonesty applies with full force. In other
words there is no a priori reason to assume that communication must be
honest in such situations. This is important because without honesty
cooperation could easily collpase in such situations (e.g.). Our goal
is to investigate the evolution and the miantanence of honest signalling
under such circumstances.