[MC1]WE WILL WORK ON THAT THE LAST THING

 [JC2]4000 words

 [MC3]Our old intro. Above Gary’s intro

 [DE4]Explain that this was for baseline profiling only… not an outcome measure

 [DE5]Ramp time?

 [DE6]Ramp time? Same as real?

 [DE7]This is preferred. Check for consistency tDCS, TDCS, t-DCS

 [DE8]Have a look at how this writing is different from previous, and take note FYI

 [DE9]Did we not just use C3 and C4 sites? I don’t think we shuffled the cap position because this would disturb the EEG 10-20 system markings

 [DE10]GIULIO PLEASE CHECK THE DEFINITION . THANKS

 [DE11]GIULIO – PLEASE REWORD THIS DEFN - A LITTLE CONFUSING

 [DE12]what does this mean? We would not have done both

 [DE13]Contradiction – if it is ‘exactly’ the optimal site, unlikely exactly C3. Best just to say C3 if that is what we did. Again, we cannot use tetminlogy of optimal site, unless we searched for it and used it as with other studies. Here it is more important to maintain C3, since C3 is approximately the best site, but is absolutely the only conventional site we can compare other eeg sites. If we moved this, the whole 10-20 system is out.

 [DE14]Unclear? Do you mean “statistical analysis was performed on raw values (T-test?),and normalized data for graphical presentation”

 [DE15]Do we really report SD and SEM for TMS results??? check

 [JC16]shall we remove it since the sample is very small?

 [DE17]Do we deltete? And wat method was used for statistics – Giulio and Laura.