Laura Dubreuil Vall edited figures/_DanielLoewe_2750/caption.html  about 8 years ago

Commit id: 1ec01b0cea5af9df0e92cdf4dfe1880332bb1dfd

deletions | additions      

       

Figure 

Figure 2 - Normalized pre-post EEG power, frequency and coherence for 1mA tDCS compared to sham stimulation shows; a) significant increase of the mean power in the Gamma frequency band under C3, the anodal stimulating electrode; b) a significant increment of faster activity around the anode (stimulating) electrode (C3, F3) with a decreased mean frequency in the Alpha band near the return electrode (P4); and c) significantly increased mean coherence in the fastest frequency bands (Beta2, Gamma) and SMR under the stimulating electrode (C3), the symmetrical location in the other hemisphere (C4) and the vertex (Cz). The lower map provides the p-value (Wilcoxon test) of Sham vs. active (1mA) stimulation. 

Figure  1: Left: Starstim  wireless t DCS device. Right: Electric field induced by montage + C3, - AF8 using Neuroelectrics' “Pi” electrodes (3.14 cm2 Ag/AgCl electrodes).