deletions | additions       diff --git a/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex b/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex  index 3f5e647..e70621a 100644  --- a/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex  +++ b/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex 
...
\textbf{3. Deposit unavoidability: a goal to pursue}  As we already mentioned (\textit{supra}, §), a mandatory (\textit{“The \footnote{\textit{“The  policy states that research articles must be deposited in the institutional repository (that is, the policy is mandatory}") mandatory"}.}  \cite{swan2015sept}) and non-waivable (\textit{“The policy states that this action cannot be waived: that is, whatever the conditions of embargo, the article must be deposited at the point specified by the policy”} \cite{swan2015sept}) deposit is an element \textit{“positively correlated with a successful outcome”} \cite{swan2015sept} of an OA policy (Just to be clear, with “deposit” we refer to the deposit of the full-text of the contribution, not of the mere metadata. We will anyway touch to metadata \textit{infra}, at the end of the present subsection.). It is not for nothing that such a deposit regime is the one generally recommended to policy-makers by the most relevant sources.  For the Berlin Declaration, deposit is one of the two conditions a contribution must respect in order to satisfy Open Access: \textit{“Open Access contributions must satisfy two conditions: […] 2. A complete version of the work […] is deposited […] in at least one online repository”} \cite{berlin2003}.