deletions | additions       diff --git a/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex b/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex  index 65b9d07..29168cd 100644  --- a/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex  +++ b/textbf_Discussion_and_recommendations_textbf__.tex 
...
Therefore, only Universities of Bergamo, of Milano, and of Padova apply the OA-by-default regime truly recommended: the one which also envisages a non-waivable deposit requirement.  We stated that a policy establishing a mandatory and non-waivable deposit requirement would have also been effective enough even if not accompanied by an OA requirement.  Therefore, for what concerns those seven residual Italian policies not applying an OA-by-default regime, but only requesting or recommending OA, we can notice that only University of Trieste applies such recommended alternative regime of deposit. Universities of Firenze and of Pisa even simply recommend deposit; University of Firenze require deposit only in case of public funded contributions, otherwise it is only recommended. The others – Universities of Cagliari, of Trento, and of Udine – state deposit is required, but do not specify anything about waiver (University of Udine's policy-maker however told us that practically deposit waiver was possible).ù possible).  To sum-up, we can notice a tendential gap between the OA regime applied by the fourteen Italian Universities examined and the OA policy schemes recommended as the most effective.