this is for holding javascript data
Adam Ginsburg large h2co
about 11 years ago
Commit id: 7b657be69d69026e4a78c211735c8e663cdf5970
deletions | additions
diff --git a/ch_h2colarge.tex b/ch_h2colarge.tex
index ed998a3..3858631 100644
--- a/ch_h2colarge.tex
+++ b/ch_h2colarge.tex
...
%FIGURE: mcmc column vs density
I successfully made density maps of the W51 cloud, though because the velocity
structure is quite complicated, I need to fit two components to most of the
map. Two-component fits are never particularly stable, so it was necessary to
restrict the parameters being fitted, and even then the results aren't
perfectly reliable. Despite those caveats, there are some reliable fits,
particularly towards the `core' of W51 Main / W51 IRS 2. There are two
high-density components with $n\sim10^5-10^5.5$ at different velocities evident
in Figure \ref{fig:w51h2cofits}. The southern component, centered on W51 Main,
has $v_{LSR}\sim56-59$. The northern component, a strip going through IRS 2
and towards the west, peaks around $v_{LSR}\sim68-69$. A 10 \kms difference
between two extremely dense components, both which are necessarily in the
foreground of the HII region, is shocking (probably, anyway, unless the sound
speed is very high).
\FigureTwo{figures_chH2CO/W51_H2CO_2parfit_v1_densityvelocity.png}
{figures_chH2CO/W51_H2CO_2parfit_v2_densityvelocity.png}
{Density and Velocity fits to the W51 Arecibo and GBT \formaldehyde
data cubes. \todo{Describe why yellow is wrong}}
{fig:w51h2cofits}{1}
\input{solobib}
\end{document}