this is for holding javascript data
Shannon Mason edited composite cyclones 2.tex
almost 10 years ago
Commit id: e7c800e5ab845b4834260900d0edad9fd283883a
deletions | additions
diff --git a/composite cyclones 2.tex b/composite cyclones 2.tex
index e388088..11fbdf8 100644
--- a/composite cyclones 2.tex
+++ b/composite cyclones 2.tex
...
Figure~\ref{fig:CC_RFO_sim} shows the simulated RFO of the hybrid cloud regimes in the composite
cyclone. cyclone; figure~\ref{fig:CC_RFO_sim-CC_RFO_obs} is the difference between the simulated RFO and observations.
We observe:
\begin{itemize}
\item H1 dominates the composite cyclone everywhere except the cyclone centre.
\item There is some indication of compensation between cloud regimes:
\begin{itemize}
\item the model produces H4 where H5 is observed (in the cold-air section)
\item and H2 where H3 is observed (near the cyclone centre and north-eastern quadrant)
\item H6 is produced in the model in the cold-air section, but overall mid-level clouds are lacking the model \cite{Govekar_2014}
\item The frontal structure seems to favour optically thinner clouds (H10) over the thicker clouds (H11), with the frontal band shorter and further south than in observations. Could this be an issue with composite cyclone?
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}