Proof of property 1.
For all \(b\) and \(k\), let \(\phi\left(b,k\right)\) be defined by \(\phi\left(b,k\right)\equiv 8\left(b-k\right)^{2}+\left(1-k\right)\left(1-2b+k^{2}\right)\).
We distinguish two cases:
If \(\delta\leq k\), we show that
If \(\delta>k\), we show that
Property 1 directly follows, assuming that \(b\) and \(k\) are such that \(\phi\left(b,k\right)>0\). To obtain the last sign, denote \(\varphi\left(b,k,\delta\right)\equiv\phi\left(b,k\right)+2\left(1-2b+k\right)\left(\delta-k\right)\). Then:
If \(1-2b+k\geq 0\), then \(\varphi\left(b,k,\delta\right)>0\) directly follows from \(\delta>k\) and \(\phi\left(b,k\right)>0\);
If \(1-2b+k<0\), then \(\varphi\left(b,k,\delta\right)\) is decreasing in \(\delta\) and is bounded below by \(\varphi\left(b,k,1\right)\).
Then remark that \(\varphi\left(b,k,1\right)=8b^{2}-2\left(3+5k\right)b+\left(3-k+7k^{2}-k^{3}\right)\) and that this quadratic polynomial in \(b\) is strictly positive.11Because the discriminant \(\Delta=-4(15-8k)(1-k)\text{\texttwosuperior}<0\) and \(\varphi\left(k,k,1\right)=\left(3-k\right)\left(1-k\right)^{2}>0\).
Finally, we can check that the condition that \(\phi\left(b,k\right)>0\) is not very restrictive. Rearrange \(\phi\left(b,k\right)\) to write it as \(\phi\left(b,k\right)=8b^{2}-2\left(1+7k\right)b+\left(1-k+9k^{2}-k^{3}\right)\). We have:
If \(k<7/8\), this quadratic polynomial in \(b\) is strictly positive;22Because the discriminant \(\text{\textgreek{D}}=4\left(8k-7\right)\left(1-k\right)^{2}<0\) and \(\phi\left(k,k\right)=\left(1-k\right)^{3}>0\).
If \(k\geq 7/8\), it is positive if \(b\notin\left[k+\left(1-k\right)\left(1-\sqrt{8k-7}\right)/8,k+\left(1-k\right)\left(1+\sqrt{8k-7}\right)/8\right]\).
\(\blacksquare\)