this is for holding javascript data
Jitka Hilliard edited PlanGet_familiar_with_the_data__.html
over 8 years ago
Commit id: 2e5c81457cfcd5f03082f4cfd8fcda89e830696c
deletions | additions
diff --git a/PlanGet_familiar_with_the_data__.html b/PlanGet_familiar_with_the_data__.html
index 70b5ed1..6589c8c 100644
--- a/PlanGet_familiar_with_the_data__.html
+++ b/PlanGet_familiar_with_the_data__.html
...
Plan
Get familiar with the data:
Can we access the data?
Is it possible to extract information or does it need hand collection?
Data:
13D
13G
News
I collected several WSJ articles in 2015: almost all of the activists tend to target large corporations with a lot of cash. Do these activists have 5 percent holdings (and therefore have to fill with the SEC) or do they use other means of pressure on the board ("just vote no" campaigns, legal suits,...) (To acquire 5 percent of large corporation, such as Apple is costly and difficult. Therefore I assume that these activists may use different means of pressure to the board, such as "just vote no" campaigns or others. Could you cross-check the news data with the 13G filling for several news articles - I am printing those for you)
Look what you)
Descriptive Statistics:
Number of activist efforts during the years (probably 2000 to 2015 if it is not too difficult to collect the data - this time period would contain pre-crises, crises and post-crises period)
Who are the activists: hedge funds, mutual funds, pension funds, individual investors...
What are the characteristics of firms that are targeted by different groups of activists (size, industry, age, cash, profitability, payout...)
What happens to these firms after they are targetted (overall and by activists enter the firm:
Dividends
Repurchases
CEO groups):
DIvidends
Repurchases
CEO turnover
Board changes
Takeovers
Spinn-offs
ROA
Stock price (event study)
R&Ds: According changes
Takeovers
Spin-offs
ROA
ROA
Stock price: event study
R&D expenditures: According to the WSJ article (DENNIS K. BERMAN: A Radical Idea for Activist Investors, Jan. 27, 2015) activists are going mainly after cash and making a company a take-over target. This is rather improvement in the short-term not long-term performance. Accordingly, activists stay usulally less than two years. What about improving a long-term performance? Why activists do not identify companies that are paying too much into dividends or buybacks and do not pursue profitable long-term opportunities?
...
opportunities?
Cash
...